Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Bolton: Libya 'a strategic embarrassment' for Nato

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 11:23 AM
Original message
John Bolton: Libya 'a strategic embarrassment' for Nato
Edited on Mon Sep-05-11 11:26 AM by lebkuchen
BBC's Stephen Sackur spoke to John Bolton at the annual Ambrosetti Forum on international affairs, at Lake Como, Italy, about America's economy, its military, and the current situation in Libya.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/hardtalk/9580951.stm

If you can find the entire interview, it's worth a listen. It's scary to think the US lived with this sick mentality for 8 years. The interview is also entertaining, watching a real journalist challenge this creep in a way the US media never achieved. (Bolton gets very combative w/Sackur, calling him a British "liberal").

I wonder how Bolton can leave the US w/o being arrested for war crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Scooter, Kkkarl And big Dick the autobiographer ,all protected and paid for
by us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Bolton's comments were so pathetic, Sackur started laughing a few times
Edited on Mon Sep-05-11 11:47 AM by lebkuchen
Bolton said he would do away w/the World Health Organization if it interfered w/US interests.

Just whose interests does Bolton have in mind? Not the 44 million Americans w/o health insurance.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Getting rid of the WHO is already under way.
US diplomats spied on UN leadership
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/28/us-embassy-cables-spying-un

Washington wanted intelligence on the contentious issue of the "relationship or funding between UN personnel and/or missions and terrorist organisations" and links between the UN Relief and Works Agency in the Middle East, and Hamas and Hezbollah. It also wanted to know about plans by UN special rapporteurs to press for potentially embarrassing investigations into the US treatment of detainees in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantánamo Bay, and "details of friction" between the agencies co-ordinating UN humanitarian operations, evidence of corruption inside UNAids, the joint UN programme on HIV, and in international health organisations, including the World Health Organisation (WHO). It even called for "biographic and biometric" information on Dr Margaret Chan, the director general of WHO, as well as details of her personality, role, effectiveness, management style and influence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Our very own Borat. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Good one!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. john bolton: an american embarrassment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC