Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Said To Be Looking At $300 Billion Jobs Plan - AP/Salon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:10 PM
Original message
Obama Said To Be Looking At $300 Billion Jobs Plan - AP/Salon
Looks like 130 billion to me, after you take out the 170 billion.

Obama said to be looking at $300 billion jobs plan
BY JIM KUHNHENN, ASSOCIATED PRESS
TUESDAY SEP 06, 2011 19:06 ET

<snip>

People familiar with the White House deliberations on a jobs package say President Barack Obama is considering a plan totaling about $300 billion in tax cuts and spending for 2012.

Two of the biggest measures are expected to be a one-year extension of a payroll tax cut for workers and a continuation of unemployment benefits. Those items would total about $170 billion.

The people spoke on the condition of anonymity because the plan was still being finalized and some proposals could be changed before Obama introduces his plan Thursday night in his address to Congress.

The White House is considering tax incentives for businesses that hire as well as spending for public works projects.

<snip>

Link: http://www.salon.com/wires/allwires/09/06/D9PJAEIG1_us_obama_jobs_package/index.html

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Doesn't sound like much of a jobs plan if this is true... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taught_me_patience Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. I thought he was going to "go big"?
This seems like a rehash of stuff already tried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Big tax cuts, big new free trade agreements...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taught_me_patience Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Big time insanity
:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Big losses in 2012
hmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. tax cuts and free trade... well folks...
it's a done deal. We're screwed for a generation or more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. What kind of Democrat would think those items would improve jobs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. a DINO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Yep, that's worked so damn well, and Bush was such a success, yep, why
spoil a good thing. Hell, do it right, maybe two generations can be screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Pretty big huh
Edited on Tue Sep-06-11 08:18 PM by Autumn
let's see $300 billion minus $170 billion leaves $130 billion to get Americans back to work. :shrug: Maybe he could have phoned this in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Gee, why don't we just give every American $1M. That would only be
about $330M! We're probably already headed toward hyperinflation, compared to the banks and all of the quantitative easing, what's another $330M. That would spur demand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Hell Man... I'd Vote For YOU !!!
I LIKE that plan, LOL!!!

:rofl:

:evilgrin:

:bounce:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Pretty cool, huh! Any pres. candidate wanting that would probably get about
99% of the vote! Look at the cost savings! My plan = $330M. Obama's plan = $300B. Even the teabaggers would jump on my plan. Just to make it spicy, it's TAX FREE!


:bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :toast:
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Your plan equals exactly $1 for every American. ONE. FREAKING. DOLLAR.


Got math?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. LOL, like I said, lots of cost savings!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Um... you need a math lesson

There are 330 million Americans. If you spent $330 million you would end up giving exactly $1 to every American

To give every American $1 million (that's 1,000,000).... you would have to have $330,000,000,000,000 dollars. Or $330 trillion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. Add it to the next quantitative easing. It's all facetious.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrTriumph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well, it will boost employment in S. Korea & Columbia ....
x
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. Still with the tax cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattvermont Donating Member (428 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. anything short of 1 Trillion
for infrastructure is a waste. Bridges, flood walls, dams, roads, municipal energy upgrades: insulate, windows, LED lighting, private and public energy incentives, smart grid, train, wind, solar...

or

more of the same for decades to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
29. + 1,000,000,000... What You Said !!!
:hi:

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharaoh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. Is he looking up his ass?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. I'm Loving The Unreccs On This One...
You'd think they'd jump at the chance to be supportive of this plan.

:hide::evilgrin::hide:

:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. Your OP doesn't have quite the
"right" slant to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #25
37. LOL !!!
:loveya:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. How about increasing income tax rates...
Edited on Tue Sep-06-11 08:40 PM by roamer65
to 60% on those making more than $500k and a $2T public works program that only buys American materials.

Now that would be bold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattvermont Donating Member (428 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. precisely..
Edited on Tue Sep-06-11 08:45 PM by mattvermont
although I doubt it would require 60% to fund such a proposal. At any rate, anything short of this is a disingenuous attempt at solving the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
19. Wait.... Let me get my magnifying glass....


Yep... I can see it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
23. An anonymous source who admits the plan is not finalized
Wait. Until. Thursday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Oh C'mon... What Fun Would THAT Be ???
Who knows if it wasn't the WH who floated this... just to test the reaction?

:shrug:

But you are correct... Thursday night will tell the tale.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
27. Did I miss the speech? People familiar, speaking on condition of anonymity.are cowards...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Yeah, But What If They We're Asked To Do So ???
This White House has not been above floating a trial balloon.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Yeah, but some are water balloons they toss over the WH gate on us! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. LOL !!! - Just Be Thankful They Had Water In Them...
:evilgrin:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eilen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
33. Pssst! Obama! The point is to create jobs
in the US! Not Asia, South America--- here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newportdadde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
35. At what point do we start talking about tariffs or eliminating H-1Bs and offshore labor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
36. And the Republicans will say no to this small plan....
They're gonna mock him, call him a socialist, a big spender, blah, blah, blah, all for $300 billion.
:banghead: :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
38. too tiny to be effective. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Oh... The Joke Potential There... Shall Be Quashed...
We need a straight-jacket smilie.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
40. If so, he is not going big...
Obama is a great campaigner but he needs to become a great leader.

He has fantastic potential and he could use his skills and his bully pulpit to gather support from the American people who voted him into office. I did believe in hope and change when I cast my vote for him, but I see little evidence of it so far.

Perhaps he needs some new advisers.

The Republican party has been taken over by the Tea Party who is proposing the incredibly stupid idea of a balanced budget amendment. Obama could point out that if we would have had that amendment when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor and dragged us into WWII, we would be teaching German in our schools today and celebrating the "Thousand Year Reich".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
41. Ah, yes, tax cuts, the proven jobs creator.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
42. If that's the proposal, just imagine what it will get "bargained" down to.
I wish to hell someone had taken the president to a swap meet or yard sale at some point in his life so that he could have learned the basics of negotiation.

Of course, he might actually want a small, irrelevant "jobs package" consisting mostly of tax cuts, in which case I wish he would spare us the bad theater and just openly admit that he mostly agrees with the Republicans when it comes to economics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. + 1,000,000,000... What You Said !!!
:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC