|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 08:53 PM Original message |
I know Roemer has no chance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
1. Yep, I just listened to him. Yep, moderate republicans were OK. One could |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 08:55 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. He sounded like a modern day conservative democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 09:09 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. In fact, he sounded less conservative than some of the dems IMO. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnnieBW (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
3. Yeah. He's making sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 08:59 PM Original message |
It used to be...1992 is the real break |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shireen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
4. he'll never get my vote for president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
teddy51 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
5. Agree, but I doubt if he will be given any consideration in the current political enviornment! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 08:59 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
6. Ronald Reagan would be un-nominatable in this party today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 09:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Or worst...tax and spend liberal! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 09:14 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. He bailed out Socialist Security and signed a pro-abortion law as CA governor! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 09:20 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. There you go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
9. You will NEVER hear me say this about any other Rethug, but I actually liked that man. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 09:04 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. If you are old enough... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 09:16 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. :) I know. I'm old enough. Politicians actually use to socialize with the other party. They were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 09:19 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. There you go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
13. He is apparently also on The Daily Show tonight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 09:17 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Oh they are back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 09:20 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. I know, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 09:21 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtrockville (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
20. Very Refreshing. Rachel (as usual) did a great job interviewing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 11:58 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Roemer has zero chances |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:56 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC