|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Thu Sep-08-11 04:20 PM Original message |
I think that Fire Dog Lake will publish a negative article about the jobs speech. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Thu Sep-08-11 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
1. If it's a bad speech sure they will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Thu Sep-08-11 04:27 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. They will regardless. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven
![]() |
Thu Sep-08-11 04:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. If it's the best speech |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scurrilous
![]() |
Thu Sep-08-11 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
2. It's probably already written. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sheepshank
![]() |
Thu Sep-08-11 04:24 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I assumed it would be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly
![]() |
Thu Sep-08-11 04:50 PM Response to Reply #4 |
13. Multiple versions to cover alternative defenitions of "go big" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DisgustipatedinCA
![]() |
Thu Sep-08-11 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
3. I'm guessing you're right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Thu Sep-08-11 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
5. Yup. And whatever's said in the speech is immaterial...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Thu Sep-08-11 04:29 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. I like the statistical analysis in your signature line. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adhd_what_huh
![]() |
Thu Sep-08-11 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
6. feckless craven Obama haters can pound sand.....just sayin' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Thu Sep-08-11 04:50 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. Duh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637
![]() |
Thu Sep-08-11 04:33 PM Response to Original message |
10. I bet a lot of publishers already have negative reviews written. It's become |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number23
![]() |
Thu Sep-08-11 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
11. You don't have to be Kreskin to figure that one out! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman
![]() |
Thu Sep-08-11 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
12. Ya think??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrsCorleone
![]() |
Thu Sep-08-11 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
15. Cha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck
![]() |
Thu Sep-08-11 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
16. And whether or not it is deserving... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 06:30 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC