|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
mfcorey1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:13 PM Original message |
Ed Shultz is off base with his comments that the President has told the super committee to do deep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
1. Or 'adjustments' is code for cuts. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mfcorey1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. What cuts do you think he will suggest? Give me an example. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. They could look at the extent to which CMS reporting systems are being directed by Risk Managers rat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:37 PM Response to Reply #3 |
14. Raising Medicare to 67 (or 70!) isn't only a cut to the program |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:43 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. I missed that. Who is saying that's a possibility? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:48 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Medicare to 67 was what Obama was offering during the debt debacle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 08:10 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. Who knows how much of that was authentic and how much was theater. When you're talking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:42 PM Response to Reply #3 |
18. Got popcorn??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 10:49 PM Response to Reply #3 |
28. How would I know? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 10:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
30. or code to reduce waste and overpricing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 11:01 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Yes, could be that, too. Or could be lots of other things. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
2. And "adjustments" can also be a euphemism for more revenue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
4. Prosecuting fraud is not an adjustment, it is simply the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 08:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
25. self-delete nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 08:16 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. It doesn't have to be legal fraud, though I'm sure that's there. There are all kinds of variations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
5. How do you know what he has told the super committee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:27 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Did you not listen to the speech? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:41 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. I did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:31 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. I rather imagine that it is not he, but Kathleen Sebelius who will make the recommendations based |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. To some professional organizations, studying Medicare is not a matter of idle speculation like it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
teddy51 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
6. I wondered that as well, he seems almost giddy about medicare and medicaid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FarLeftFist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
9. I'm FOR tackling waste, fraud, and abuse. That covers a BIG chunk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:50 PM Response to Reply #9 |
23. Wow man, that would piss off Michele Bachmann's husband! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abelenkpe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
11. Cut waste OK but would you be ok with raising the eligibilty age? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mfcorey1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:34 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. I am not for it but I know that is inevitable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abelenkpe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:52 PM Response to Reply #13 |
24. Don't think we need to go there but do think it will be offered up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 11:00 PM Response to Reply #13 |
31. I see no reason whatsoever for it to be "inevitable" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:40 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. If they're actually allowed to go after the bullshit that goes on, there will be no need to raise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lbrtbell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
16. "Adjustments" is code for "cuts" - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
19. "adjustments" is just a weasel word |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrmpa (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
22. Agree with you-Schultz is beginning to see things....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
29. the President did not say deep cuts. Ed is full of shit. Again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Jan 14th 2025, 12:53 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC