|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
chimpymustgo
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 10:05 AM Original message |
A matter of PUBLIC HEALTH: Why Not Regulate Guns as Seriously as Toys? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
justiceischeap
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
1. I think the NRA lobby is much more well-funded than Toy lobby's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toucano
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 11:12 AM Response to Reply #1 |
13. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
2. Well, duh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullwinkle428
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
3. Chris Hayes explained it beautifully on last night's Rachel show - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 11:25 AM Response to Reply #3 |
16. Did you know congress passed, and the president signed the replacement for the previous bill? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullwinkle428
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 01:06 PM Response to Reply #16 |
33. Was the NRA involved in lobbying against this bill in particular? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 01:11 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. *nod* the previous bill had some pretty big holes.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 01:22 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. In essence it was a horribly stupid and vague bill which never should have been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
4. The story starts with a false claim. firearms are heavily regulated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 10:19 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. "well regulated" = no limits on allowed regulation. Oh, how inconvenient for gun worshippers nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 10:22 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. ROFL. So much wrong with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 10:25 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. If "well regulated" doesn't mean "regulated," what does "militia" mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 10:31 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Bogus claim and settled law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 12:16 PM Response to Reply #8 |
24. I know you can cite right-wing "reasoning" in Heller |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 12:45 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. What a pathetic personal attack. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 12:52 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Um, Heller wasn't a 9-0 decision. Sorry you see attacks on Scalia's reasoning as "personal" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 12:54 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. It wasn't a 9-0 decision but the court WAS unanimous in the belief that ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 12:56 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Yes, I know that community safety is "nonsense" to your ilk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 12:58 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. No the DISSENTING OPINION stated the 2A protects an individual right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 01:08 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. But in your paranoia and rage, what you miss is the community interest in sensible regulation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 01:19 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. I believe in sensible restrictions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 02:13 PM Response to Reply #37 |
48. I have never claimed no individual right exists. I am as stuck with the 2nd Amendment as everyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MedicalAdmin
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 11:18 AM Response to Reply #7 |
14. OR better yet, sign 'em up and ship 'em over. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
badtoworse
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 11:22 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. The "militia" means all able bodied men between 18 and 45 years of age |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 12:17 PM Response to Reply #15 |
25. Actually, originally, it did. The Founding Fathers were trying to avoid standing armies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
badtoworse
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 01:27 PM Response to Reply #25 |
40. In that sense, I suppose you are correct, in lieu of a standing army... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 01:29 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MedicalAdmin
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 01:32 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. Um... what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 01:39 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Well even if you are a non-gun owner you are in the militia. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MedicalAdmin
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 04:10 PM Response to Reply #44 |
49. So is that right absolute. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 06:51 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. Of course there are limits. No pro-RKBA person on DU has said otherwise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RC
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 10:59 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Deflect and obfuscate much? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 11:04 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. I didn't make the car comparison it was in the OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaveinJapan
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 07:40 AM Response to Reply #4 |
52. Liability... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 08:20 AM Response to Reply #52 |
53. The likelihood of being accidentally injured by someone elses firearm is far less than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bragi
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
9. Comment re: Canada |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kctim
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 11:40 AM Response to Reply #9 |
18. Thanks for that info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 11:46 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. They have no right. Nothing to bypass. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kctim
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 12:55 PM Response to Reply #20 |
30. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
badtoworse
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 11:46 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. What does their constitution say about the right to keep and bear arms? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 11:51 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. It doesn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
badtoworse
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 11:55 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Sounds perfect for certain regulars in the Gungeon - nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bragi
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 07:32 AM Response to Reply #18 |
51. There is no "right to bear arms" in Canada |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kctim
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 09:50 AM Response to Reply #51 |
55. Wisely? Guess that is a matter of opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
badtoworse
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
12. Maybe because children aren't supposed to be playing with guns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Upton
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
17. Violent crime is down.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
19. It would make no sense to regulate guns as we do toys, because THEY'RE NOT TOYS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
astroBspacedog
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 12:25 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. Maybe we can make sure there is no lead in the paint ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
36. Deleted message |
Statistical
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 01:20 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Name a common sense gun control which you would like to see implemented? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChoppinBroccoli
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
42. You Can Buy A Gun At Wal-Mart, But You Have To Smuggle 4th Of July Sparklers Across The Border...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
craigmatic
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
45. sadly guns are the only things we still make in this country. If China started making our guns I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Puzzledtraveller
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
46. toy guns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 01:51 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. We had a war on guns.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
area51
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 09:01 AM Response to Original message |
54. If not a gun, Loughner could have picked up a knife. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC