|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
kpete
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 11:38 AM Original message |
Lawyer for Assange’s Sex Accusers Helped In CIA Torture Rendition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
1. So? The lawyer was Sweden's Minister of Justice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bragi
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 11:51 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Yep, nothing to see here for sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 01:04 AM Response to Reply #2 |
10. A high profile lawyer was drawn to a high profile case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 12:02 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. I wonder if it is equally suspicious that the unabomber/McVeigh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 12:20 PM Response to Reply #10 |
20. He's high profile because of his bizarre beliefs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
3. Because high profile political lawyers are always assigned to Sweden's "sex by surprise" cases. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 12:30 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. She hired him. He wasn't "assigned." n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 12:34 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Which "she" - the one with the CIA ties? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 12:59 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. More guilt-by-association, I see. She knew someone who knew someone . . . n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 12:56 PM Response to Reply #8 |
23. In this case - hell yes guilt by association. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestate10
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 11:28 PM Response to Reply #8 |
46. That is the way it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoeyT
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 11:27 AM Response to Reply #3 |
14. The fact that you refer to rape as "Sex by surprise" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MattBaggins
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 12:12 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 12:52 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. That's the ACTUAL charge. There is no rape charge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celebrandil
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 01:51 PM Response to Reply #21 |
31. Yes, there is a rape charge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 02:20 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Do you realize that there IS NO ACTUAL CHARGE? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celebrandil
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 02:43 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. You are right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 02:48 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Are you Swedish? Do you live there? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celebrandil
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 04:13 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Yes, I am. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 05:15 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. I was curious how this is all being portrayed in the Swedish media |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celebrandil
![]() |
Sat Jan-15-11 10:14 AM Response to Reply #36 |
47. The lawyer and sex crimes in Sweden |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki
![]() |
Sun Jan-16-11 03:01 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. I appreciate this info, coming from someone in Sweden. It just adds to the suspicion though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki
![]() |
Sun Jan-16-11 03:05 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. Former Ministers of Justice are routinely put on cases involving broken condoms. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celebrandil
![]() |
Mon Jan-17-11 07:10 AM Response to Reply #49 |
53. It gets worse... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki
![]() |
Mon Jan-17-11 05:41 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. Great info Celebrandil, interesting to hear a perspective from Sweden. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reorg
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 05:38 PM Response to Reply #31 |
38. actually, the law doesn't differ from that in other countries with respect to the aspect of violence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 01:21 PM Response to Reply #14 |
30. You're not familiar with this case at all, are you?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude
![]() |
Sun Jan-16-11 03:12 PM Response to Reply #14 |
51. Do you know anything about the charges? Apparently not.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
6. Just following orders, not doubt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidthegnome
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
7. Certainly smells fishy to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poboy
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
9. Recommend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 01:06 AM Response to Original message |
11. k&r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 01:22 AM Response to Original message |
12. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 01:26 AM Response to Original message |
13. Why do the accusers need lawyers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 01:12 PM Response to Reply #13 |
27. to protect her interests, why else? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MattBaggins
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
15. The "it's OK because now it's Obama" crowd is right on cue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
17. Irrelevant. The evidence in the case is what matters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Desertrose
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 12:55 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. You really believe that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 12:59 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. What evidence is there that the Swedish system is corrupt? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Desertrose
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 01:06 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Is there evidence that prove any government is NOT corrupt? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 08:08 PM Response to Reply #25 |
39. That's pretty cynical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Desertrose
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 08:14 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Yes...it is...with good reason. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 11:03 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. Er, prove that in Sweden one is allowed to argue one's innocence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 01:14 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. They coorperated with an illegal torture program in secret. What more do you need? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 08:10 PM Response to Reply #29 |
40. Who? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 09:58 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. The Swedish government and this gentleman in particular. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 11:02 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. It's corrupt to have "links to the CIA?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
19. How'd I Miss This????!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
26. interesting. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
28. Surprise! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
37. Step right Up and take a Big Bite of Crow!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbc5g
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
42. Not surprising to see the CIA's grimey hands up in this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Jan-16-11 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
50. Deleted message |
Forkboy
![]() |
Sun Jan-16-11 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
52. The people who see this as an innocent connection crack me up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui
![]() |
Mon Jan-17-11 05:53 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. None are so blind as those who refuse to see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC