|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 05:24 PM Original message |
I say Elizabeth Warren for President in 2016 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. I wish I could vote in MA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 05:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. I miss that state, one of the most sane ones I've ever lived in. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 05:37 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Yes. I am a Californian. And I love California. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 06:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
22. That's a low bar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 07:30 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. But the spectrum of CA is a wide one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
teddy51 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
2. lol Wouldn't the Repugs have a crap fit if she did run and won? I'm not sure who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 05:48 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Word is she is planning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 06:07 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. For the Senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
3. Yea!!! OK!!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
4. Hell, I say Elizabeth Warren for President in 2012! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 05:48 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Gee... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Davis_X_Machina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 05:53 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Well, Pope isn't on the ballot... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 05:55 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jannyk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 06:21 PM Response to Reply #4 |
17. You got that right. k&r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
7. Maybe we ought to see if she can get elected to the Senate first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scuba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
10. I down with that. This lady knocks the socks off the competition... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Davis_X_Machina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 05:52 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. She hasn't won so much... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capitalocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
13. Why wait? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
16. NO ONE will succeed without a majority big enough to force change. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 06:27 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. By then the Congress will have Democratic majorities. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 06:42 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Don't go chasing waterfalls... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-15-11 09:52 AM Response to Reply #24 |
30. ha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Countdown_3_2_1 (778 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
18. why not 2012 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
19. I was saying it when everyone was saying Obama was throwing her under the bus. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
21. Why Wait Until then? Elizabeth in 2012 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sheepshank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 07:40 PM Response to Reply #21 |
29. Not publically recognizable as an ELECTED official....yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
23. After just four years in the Senate, I'm sure she'll be completely ready for the job. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
25. So you all want to elect someone who would have only four years in the US Senate. Sounds vaguely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stuntcat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
27. Yay! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sheepshank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-11 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
28. State representation in an elected office first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Jan 14th 2025, 12:44 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC