Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Thom Hartman & "pro life"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
lillypaddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 07:10 PM
Original message
Thom Hartman & "pro life"
I was listening to Thom this evening (rebroadcast from this morning) - and I was surprised to hear him continually referring to anti-choice people as "pro life." Not only that, he seemed to justify many of the anti-choice people as democrats who are in favor of health care for all, and other liberal ideas, thereby somehow deflecting some of the negativity that should go hand-in-hand with anti-choice people.

Frankly, I was taken aback. I like Thom, & listen to him frequently. I hate it, though, that he appears to give legitimacy to those who are anti-choice because they supposedly support other liberal tenets. If one is against a woman's right to choose, they don't deserve a free pass in other areas. Pro-choice is absolutely non-negotiable, and it is disturbing that someone as intelligent and progressive as Thom would give a free pass to those who are not pro-choice. Please let Thom know that (1) referring to these people as anti-choice is the preferred method of description. (2)If someone doesn't believe that a woman has the right to make decisions about her own body and destiny, it doesn't matter what else they believe in ... they are NOT deserving of a pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ineeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. 100% agree.
Non-negotiable for me, too. It's the first thing I look at in a candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. So, if someone would, for example, support an end to wars, or Medicare for all, or
strong environmental regulations, we are not permitted to validate that support if they aren't Pro-Choice too . . .?

It is possible to be up front and known for one's own position on issue X, while collaborating on issues Y and Z.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lillypaddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Of course
it's possible to collaborate on other issues, but the way he said that "people of good conscience are pro-life," when he was referring to those who are anti-choice - it just sounded very dismissive of the whole issue. And there seems to be a strong trend to going backward these days. I've seen talk about birth control being made illegal. With the right wing nut jobs, I just think we have to be very careful how we frame our talk.

Sorry so long to reply to you. Got busy, work, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC