Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How Broward Bulldog's Dan Christensen Broke a 9/11 Conspiracy That's Actually True

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 10:12 AM
Original message
How Broward Bulldog's Dan Christensen Broke a 9/11 Conspiracy That's Actually True
Source: Broward Palm Beach New Times

Dan Christensen lost his job in the Miami Herald's Broward bureau in 2009, a casualty of rampant cost-cutting in daily journalism. Rather than throw in the towel, Christensen started his own local news site, Broward Bulldog, and vowed to continue breaking stories. "This website was the only way to do it," he says.

Now Broward Bulldog is getting some national attention. On Thursday, three days before the tenth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, Christensen broke a story that had been unreported until then: A family living in a gated community near Sarasota abruptly abandoned their home (and brand-new cars and full refrigerator) just two weeks before the planes hit the towers.

...

Christensen doesn't divulge exactly how he confirmed the scoop but says it came from "just old-fashioned shoe-leather reporting." He says that the Justice Department initially recommended that he file a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, but that would have taken way too much time. So he made some calls.

Christensen and Summers also met with Graham at Miami International Airport two Sundays ago, and had a three- to four-hour conversation with him to tell him what they had found.

Read more: http://blogs.browardpalmbeach.com/pulp/2011/09/broward_bulldog_september_11_sarasota_dan_christensen.php



Interesting backstory on the old-fashioned reporting behind this scoop
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Z-z-z-z-z-z-z. Move along." - Corporate Media Borg (R)
Edited on Wed Sep-14-11 10:15 AM by SpiralHawk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. I remember reading something similar
to this days after 9/11. It seems some members of the bin Laden family were in the US and were flown out immediately after. I realize this could all have been made up but these days I discount nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's a separate story
This was a family that bolted a couple of weeks before, after receiving visits from some of the to-be hijackers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Thanks. These stories seem to
pop up now more than before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. The "immediately after" part is false -- much of the rest is true
Edited on Wed Sep-14-11 12:33 PM by starroute
According to snopes (http://www.snopes.com/rumors/flights.asp), the 9/11 Commission reported that there were no flights prior to the reopening of national airspace on September 13 and the FBI did screen those Saudis who departed on chartered flights between September 14-24 and was satisfied that none of them was linked to the attack. One particular flight, on September 20, carried 26 passengers, most of whom were bin Laden family members and who were interviewed particularly closely by the FBI.

The oddest incident involved three young Saudis who were brought to the Tampa, Florida airport by police on September 13, flown to Lexington, Kentucky on a chartered plane shortly after the airport reopened on September 14, met there by local police, and taken to join their relatives in a hotel. For unknown reasons, the government denied for years that this had occurred, finally acknowledging it in 2004 at the request of the 9/11 Commmission. (http://www.sptimes.com/2004/06/09/Tampabay/TIA_now_verifies_flig.shtml)

So what actually happened is not quite as extreme as the stories that float around the net and does not appear to support claims of a coverup -- but it does suggest a particular solicitousness towards the Saudis, directed from the highest levels of government, and a great desire to help them get out of the country even before the resumption of ordinary commercial flights.

(From my own experience, as somebody with a son who had to get back to college that week, I was able to put him on a flight out of Newark on September 15, which was as early as tickets became available. And yes, we could see a column of smoke still rising from lower Manhattan as we drove across Jersey.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. This part of the story is new: DOJ claimed it turned everything over to the 9/11 Joint Inquiry
Edited on Wed Sep-14-11 10:31 AM by leveymg
That was the 2002 Congressional investigation, co-chaired by Sen. Graham. Somebody's not telling the truth here:

They published the story last Thursday, just after midnight. The following day -- the last business day before the much-heralded tenth anniversary -- Christensen says he called the Department of Justice for comment on why no information on the Sarasota connection had been disclosed. It had no comment.

Then, just after 7 p.m. Friday, the DOJ released a statement. "They acknowledged the existence of the investigation but said they didn't find any links to the 9/11 plot and said they had turned over everything to the <9/11 investigation> committee," says Christensen.

When the reporters called Graham with that response, the senator was livid. "It's total B.S.," he told them.


Also, please see related: http://journals.democraticunderground.com/leveymg/596
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. That's why Graham is so livid
He was directly and specifically lied to by Mueller about this, and apparently he wants somebody's head over this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Too bad he's not Chair of the Senate Intel Committee, anymore.
Edited on Wed Sep-14-11 11:06 AM by leveymg
But, Mueller's still there, with Obama's blessings.

In terms of Counter-terrorism policy and personnel, there's more continuity than anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmw Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. This was out in 2003 but in Canada
This was reported in 2003 on cbc check the link http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/conspiracytheories/saudi.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. I didn't find this story at that link
Could you help me out? I'm very interested in knowing that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fokker Trip Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. No say it ain't so..
You mean the official conspiracy theory has holes in it?

You mean that all those people who defend the official conspiracy theory will have to allow for questioning and rethinking of said theory?

Oh Noes...I can hear the heads exploding now. So inconvenient when new info disrupts the supposedly settled narrative

Cue the official DU Bush story defence brigade(TM).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
9. Oh, "old-fashioned shoe-leather reporting"
So, it wasn't on Drudge? Well, the major media can safely ignore it then. They don't run "reporting" anymore. I mean, you can find out all kinds of things if you want to waste a lot of time going around asking questions. But that doesn't get you invited to swell cocktail parties in DC. And if you're not there, you're not anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
11. News IS good news.
Excellent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC