|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
RandySF (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-11 02:14 AM Original message |
Bill would allow BART to keep out those who repeatedly break law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-11 05:05 AM Response to Original message |
1. Protesters may ride trains?! Heavens! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demosincebirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-11 08:18 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. ...and disrupt other people lives at will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-11 10:37 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. The majority haven't but thanks for making BART's argument for them . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demosincebirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-11 01:10 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. You don't comute on BART, do you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 01:05 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Not at the moment but I did commute on BART from the time it opened |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nomb (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-11 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
4. "three separate illegal acts over 90 days on BART Property" - not too bad on the first reading |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 01:14 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Except for that little detail that a BART cop can call anything you do illegal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Second Stone (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-11 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
5. How about the BART cops just shoot the protestors in the back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-11 01:13 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Wouldn't they have to be handcuffed and laying on the ground for that? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-20-11 01:23 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. But, but, when you're on the ground, drooling in an obviously aggressive way, you're a threat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:11 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC