Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

the UK has a nuke plant event

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 08:28 AM
Original message
the UK has a nuke plant event

http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php


Magnox has informed UK regulators that water was found leaking from a cracked flow meter in the active effluent treatment plant at the Sizewell A nuclear power plant earlier this month, a document obtained by Platts shows. Magnox, which is owned by EnergySolutions, is the management and operations contractor responsible for 10 nuclear sites in the UK, including Sizewell A in Suffolk. Tim Watkins, site director of Sizewell A, last week wrote to members of the Sizewell Stakeholder Group -- set up to manage the flow of information about the nuclear site -- to inform them of the incident. Sizewell A stopped generating electricity in 2006 after 40 years of operations and is in the process of defuelling. Immediately to the north of Sizewell A is Britain's newest nuclear power station, Sizewell B, which is operated by British Energy. In his letter, Watkins said that, "While carrying out routine inspections in the early hours of Saturday, September 3, an operative noted unexpected
plant indications and upon investigation, discovered water escaping from a cracked flow meter in the site's active effluent treatment plant (AETP)."

"The meter forms part of a section of the system which returns treated water to the used fuel storage pond and as such the activity in the liquid was very low. The plant was shut down before the loss initiated our early warning alarms," he said. "Our physical safety defenses performed exactly as expected. All the treated water except a small amount which remained on the floor in the AETP was captured by the system and there was no impact on personnel or the environment," he said. A "far more significant event" in the AETP, in January 2007, led to a complete review and overhaul of the plant's design and safety systems, he said. "I want to reassure you that this event does not provide any indication that improvements we made then are ineffective now," he said. Among the enhancements was the installation of early warning alarm and plant protection systems, which were not required in this case because the fall in pond levels was not enough to
trigger any of the alarms, he said. agnox's investigations show that the pond level reduced by 1.4 cm, in a total depth of 6.75 m, which equates to a loss of 7 cubic meters of treated water. In total, about 13.3 cu m of treated water was captured by the secondary containment, over a period of four and a half hours, he said.

Magnox is carrying out its own investigations to identify any lessons to be learned from this event, Watkins said, and will share them with the stakeholder group in due course. The Office for Nuclear Regulation and the Environment Agency has been informed, he said, and inspectors from both organizations have "declared their intention to carry out their own investigations and we will support them in doing so." James Tott, Magnox Sites spokesman, said by telephone Monday that the company has no plans at the moment to issue a public statement about the incident.
-------------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nuke plant non-event...
You may want to read the fable of the boy who cried wolf.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. If you search the subject
You'll the same happened two years ago. Don't worry about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. If the compressor in a bottled drinking water cooler in an office at a nuclear power plant
failed, some Luddite would try to make a 'sky is falling' event out of it. Crying wolf indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. On the other hand the plant operator can be on the verge of abandoning a melt down..
Edited on Tue Sep-20-11 09:34 AM by Fumesucker
While still maintaining to the public that the plant is emitting nothing more dangerous than puppies, rainbows and unicorns (I was told last time not to forget the unicorns and I didn't).

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=115x310161

Edited to add link..


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well in this case, it wasn't.
These reactors are in the process of being shut down, with defueling in progress. The leak was in a spent fuel pool, not in a reactor. The water wasn't very radioactive and was captured by secondary containment, and not only were fuel rods not exposed, but the leak was found and stopped before the alert systems were even triggered.

All events at nuclear plants have to be taken seriously. Nothing's ever going to work perfectly. Here is one of the cases in which all the systems kind of worked except for the initial failure. I find it more reassuring than anything else.

This was a reportable event, but the whole event reporting system is set up so that regulatory bodies external to the plant and the company can follow along, detect any suspicious pattern, and intervene before there IS a "nuclear event".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I was just pointing out one reason people often overreact to these things..
If the nuclear industry had a more truthful record it would be less likely to arouse suspicion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC