Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

‘Buffett Rule’ on U.S. Taxes Seen as Easier Said Than Done

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 06:40 PM
Original message
‘Buffett Rule’ on U.S. Taxes Seen as Easier Said Than Done
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-09-20/-buffett-rule-on-u-s-taxes-seen-as-easier-said-than-done.html

Sept. 20 (Bloomberg) -- Turning the “Buffett rule” proposed yesterday by President Barack Obama from a political concept into real-world tax policy aimed at the highest-earning U.S. households will prove logistically and mathematically difficult.

The concept, named for billionaire investor Warren Buffett, would require Americans earning more than $1 million a year to pay at least the same tax rate as middle-class households. Constructing such a rule would be tricky because high earners aren’t the only taxpayers benefiting from breaks; many middle- income families use deductions, credits and exemptions to drive their rates below the 17.4 percent that Buffett says he pays.

For now, the Buffett rule is less of a concrete legislative proposal and more of a political talking point that has elicited Republican cries of “class warfare.” Democrats defended the idea and urged Congress to adopt it in designing a new tax system.

“We’re not going to give the Congress a detailed proposal for how to meet that principle because we think there are a bunch of different ways to do that,” said Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, adding that the details of the rule would depend on the rest of the structure of a revamped tax code.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Laws an' shit are HARD, maaaaan!
I mean, not the kind of laws that involve dragging cancer grannies off to prison for getting high... those are EASY to do!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. So if I'm a retired billionaire
and I put my billion into tax free bonds, then I get $ 50 million a year tax free interest.

Now how am I going to get up to a 30 % tax bracket?

It will be school districts, hospitals, cities and airports screaming if you start messing with tax free bonds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. If all that money was going into, say, tax-free munis
we wouldn't have the infrastructure issues we do, I would think.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. That's where rich people put their money
Isn't it where you'd put yours?

Very safe, 5 % dividends, completely tax free.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-11 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I guess I'm old fashioned, if I was anything approaching "rich" I would go for a balanced portfolio.
Edited on Wed Sep-21-11 12:04 AM by Warren DeMontague
Certainly, tax free municipals are a good part of any diversification strategy IMHO. But I strongly doubt that "rich people" are putting anything close to all their money in 'em. On the upside, they DO fund things like hospitals and other crucial infrastructure, so I suppose that's the plus.

Although, really... 5%? I'm not an expert but that sounds a little high for the returns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-11 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Just walk into your local stockbrokers office
and ask for A rated muni bonds and there should be some at 5 %.

Even better if you're willing to loan to one of the basketcase states like California, Illinois or Nevada. Usually some of those at 5.5 %.

So let's say you sell your small business for $ 10 million and retire.

How about $ 9 million in muni bonds and $ 1 million in stocks and gold.

That would get you $ 450,000 per year tax free dividends. You'd maybe have $ 20,000 a year in taxable dividends and pretty much no capital gains most years.

So your effective tax rate would be about 2 %.

Is this guy doing anything wrong?

Is there any reason for him to take more risk than this?

I wouldn't if I was him. A lifetime income of $ 450,000 tax free sounds good enough to me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-11 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. None of the 'small business owners' I've known who could walk away with anything like 10 Million
(probably one I can think of, that's about it) simply wouldn't invest that conservatively. They wouldn't. I think it's the personality type.

Is the guy doing anything 'wrong'? No. It's his money, he can invest it how he wants.

Is there any reason for him to take more risk than this? Some people might not, but at least the type-a small business owner personality types I've met probably would, because where you and I would be comfortable with that $450,000, they would be chafing at their shorts over all the money they weren't making.

It's the same psychological mindset that makes it hard for high rollers to leave the casino.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modern_Matthew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm neither middle, nor high income...
Now where's my tiny violin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Regardless of whether or not it passes Obama wins. He either has
an election issue to run on if the House refuses to pass it or if they do accept tax increases then he has a big win to add to his health care and Osama bin Laden and financial reform successes. It is great to see Obama in the thick of the fight once again. He looks good there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC