Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sacramento homeowner loses house twice to foreclosure (bank errors)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 08:20 PM
Original message
Sacramento homeowner loses house twice to foreclosure (bank errors)
Sacramento homeowner loses house twice to foreclosure

SACRAMENTO, CA - Miriam Lord lost her home of 19 years to a bank error, then lost it again while the bank tried to correct its mistake.

"It was a case of the left hand not knowing what the right hand was doing," said Lord's attorney, Paige Hibbert.

....

Loan payments misapplied; bank realizes mistake

Chase bank statements later revealed the four trial loan modification payments had been applied to the wrong account.

...

Following Lord's eviction, the house was vandalized, fixtures were stolen and there was evidence squatters had taken up residence.

"In essence what (Chase) said was 'here, have a piece of garbage back. Now you're the owner. Start making payments again,'" Hibbert said.

http://www.news10.net/news/article/156012/2/Sacramento-homeowner-loses-house-twice-to-foreclosure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. ah, yes...so glad we bailed those thugs out
yeah, that was a good call. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Chase are a bunch of idiots.
A family member's loan wound up with them after they bought the bank that bought the bank that bought the bank (this goes on a while) that issued the loan. Luckily the house was just about paid off and we didn't have to deal with them for long, but they're total fuckups.

I'm wondering though, that snippet of paper they showed seemed to suggest that with her payments applied that lady owned $19x,xxx on her home? (I forget the exact number.) How does somebody wind up owing almost $200K on a tract home in an unremarkable neighborhood (Rosemont is working class, and a really inconvenient location) after nineteen years of payments? There might be more to this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R. Monstrous injustice is par for the course now.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC