|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Chisox08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 10:43 AM Original message |
Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) Calls Child Labor Laws Unconstitutional |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bushisanidiot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
1. So repukes are against abortion for any reason, but are in favor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rfranklin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 10:55 AM Response to Reply #1 |
9. well, it's perfect. More destitute children to put work if you ban abortion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
somone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
2. Another compassionate conservative from Utah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
3. It's acceptable to be pro-segregation again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 10:53 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. I know how you feel but if we did segregate there are good progressievs stuck in those states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katnapped (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
4. Did he mention minimum-wage laws? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chisox08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 10:54 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Yeah he did towards the end of the article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deutsey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
5. That is their agenda, you know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
7. He muse be a fan of Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 11:00 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Maybe he thinks Dred Scott v. Sandford and Plessy v. Ferguson still apply as well? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
10. Fortunately for Mike Lee, asshattery is not unconstitutional. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gatorboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
11. Welp. Enjoy the middle ages, folks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stevenmarc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
13. Mike and the sister wives better get busy pushing out a workforce |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
14. Hey, Lee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
15. He probably also believes that Congress should legislate defaulting on bonds held by SS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Historic NY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
16. Work houses, debtors prisons coming soon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
True_Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
17. K&R! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
18. Is this a contest? Are they in a competition with one another? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Jan 05th 2025, 12:37 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC