|
Major caveat: I am shooting from the hip. Snark invited.
Two of the most egregious examples I have seen of police conduct: 1) Early on, perhaps on Monday after the first weekend, a young man passively lay on top of a tarp protecting communications equipment from the rain. A policeman threw him from the tarp so that he landed on his face and then he was arrested. The numbers in Liberty Plaza were much smaller at that point. The policeman was in uniform, including a white shirt.
2) Saturday when there were a lot of people in the street a well-known video shows two young women talking to/shouting at police officers. They were clearly behind an orange barricade strip used to corral demonstrators. They do not appear to be threatening in any manner. A policeman walked up from the police side of the barricade and maced both women and then walked away. The policeman was in uniform, including a white shirt.
I have seen it asserted that the white shirt indicates superior rank (sergeant?, lieutenant?). This seems credible to me. The white shirted officers appeared older than the rank and file. There are many less of them. These are both likely indicia of superior rank.
Is this coincidental? Higher ranked officers committing worse acts than those of blue shirts? Or is there something behind that? How does one go about investigating that possibility?
The intent of higher ups could be to engage in a limited conspiracy. Order your blue shirts to be restrained and professional. Pervasive orders would likely get to the press eventually if you involved your lowest ranks. But the white shirts are career people and have a greater vested interest in complying while keeping mum. If the strategy is to use a measured amount of rough force to intimidate protesters and potentially prevent others from joining, but without the legal and PR issues involved with more extreme violence, then having a small, authoritative and loyal group implement the illegal strategy would seem to be the most effective route. Also people at higher rank would presumably be better able to withstand an internal investigation by say, Internal Affairs.
So that's it. I have no idea if there is any truth to any conspiracy. Perhaps there are simpler protocol reasons for the white shirts' action. Police engage in conspiracies every day. But whether this is such a case, I don't know. Perhaps the ACLU or the Lawyer's Guild should be aware of it when they are reviewing video. One would expect the pattern to jump out if it is more pervasive than two examples.
As I mentioned, snark is welcome. But any comments from those who have seen other incidents that cut for or against the premise (of white shirts playing a bad role) are perhaps more fruitful.
|