Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How Automation Leads to More Aviation Accidents

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 07:05 PM
Original message
How Automation Leads to More Aviation Accidents

from the Infrastructurist:



Rush-Hour Read: How Automation Leads to More Aviation Accidents
Posted on Thursday September 22nd by Daniel Lippman





After every airplane crash, investigators hunting for the cause look at all the evidence to try to discover what went wrong. Often it’s mechanical, weather, or human error that causes the crash. For the third category, authorities are increasingly finding that the heavy automation of most commercial planes are leading pilots to lose some of their manual flying expertise. A detailed Associated Press investigation looked at the problem and found:

Pilots’ “automation addiction” has eroded their flying skills to the point that they sometimes don’t know how to recover from stalls and other mid-flight problems, say pilots and safety officials. The weakened skills have contributed to hundreds of deaths in airline crashes in the last five years.


Rory Kay, an airline captain and co-chair of a Federal Aviation Administration advisory committee on pilot training, starkly laid out his concerns to the AP:

“We’re seeing a new breed of accident with these state-of-the art planes…We’re forgetting how to fly.”


The Canadian magazine Macleans also examined the impact of automation and loss-of-control accidents, which has been cited in more than fifty commercial airplane crashes in the last five years. What are some of the causes of these incidents?

Some argue that the sheer complexity of modern flight systems, though designed to improve safety and reliability, can overwhelm even the most experienced pilots when something actually goes wrong. Others say an increasing reliance on automated flight may be dulling pilots’ sense of flying a plane, leaving them ill-equipped to take over in an emergency. Still others question whether pilot-training programs have lagged behind the industry’s rapid technological advances.


Two airplane accidents crystallize the problem with automation: Colgan Air Flight 3407 which killed 50 people outside Buffalo, New York in February 2009 and Air France Flight 447 which killed all 228 people on board in the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of Brazil in June 2009. In both tragedies, investigators say the crashes could have been possibly avoided if pilots had responded correctly to the emergencies in their cockpits. In the Colgan case, the pilot mistakenly pulled back on the control yoke, instead of pushing forward. ............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.infrastructurist.com/2011/09/22/rush-hour-read-how-automation-leads-to-more-aviation-accidents/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
johnd83 Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. I am a pilot and an automation engineer, and the fault is not the automation
It is the fact that modern pilots are under-trained and underpaid to a level that is astonishing. Being a pilot used to be a solid profession, now it is just a hobby that you can scrape by being paid to do. Computers do a great job when things are going well, and free up the pilots to manage the airplane rather than expending unnecessary energy physically flying stick and rudder style. However when things go wrong, the pilot needs to be trained and experienced enough to deal with the emergency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC