Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was The Associated Press’ Transcription Of Obama’s CBC Speech “Racist?”

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Northerner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 01:40 PM
Original message
Was The Associated Press’ Transcription Of Obama’s CBC Speech “Racist?”
President Obama’s speech this Saturday night was controversial for more than just his call for African Americans to “stop complaining.”

It has become even more of a hot topic for how the Associated Press spelled “complaining” in the headline of the story.

The AP wrote “complainin” with a dropped g. Now, the debate amongst many is was the AP’s dropped g racist?

On MSNBC, the African-American author Karen Hunter complained the news service transcribed Obama’s speech without cleaning it up as other outlets did–specifically including the “dropped g’s.”

Read more: http://newsone.com/nation/newsonestaff2/obama-cbc-speech-ap-racist/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. yes. there was no need to drop the "g".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GSLevel9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Disagree
You can't change the text of a speech. If someone says "ain't" the transcriber should not replace it with "am not".
"gonna" is not going. "doin" is not doing.
Presidential transcripts from AP have historically shown pauses, stutters and grunts lol. Calling this racist is insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Watch the video. Compare with transcript.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrodosPet Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Is the point of a transcript to be accurate?
Or is it to transcribe what the transcriber thinks he meant to say, or should have said?

Here is an excerpt of the speech containing the "offending" words:

http://www.youtube.com/user/MiniRtist#p/u/8/49QNGE4EwPU

He clearly said "complainin" and "grumblin"

I often speak like that as well, so I don't see the BFD about dropping a "G", or about an organization (AP) which should be dedicated to accuracy accurately transcribing it.

If the racist baggers are going to have fits about the black president sounding "black", well we know they are going to have fits about something. Why should it mean anything to anyone else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nuclear Unicorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Perhaps the most distressing part is
amid all the debate over the transcript no one is paying attention to the substance of the speech.

It could have been and awesome speech or the worst speech ever in the history of speeches but all anyone is focusing on is whether or not it is racist to transliterate a dialect.

If AP went around transliterating Rick Perry's Texas "Y'all needn't" I wouldn't care nearly as much as I would about the fact that the rest of the sentence contained the words, "worry about the poor; they'll die off soon enough."


just sayin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HappyMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. That's it.
Pick apart tiny, ridiculous details. Don't even consider the content. That's the way to go! :sarcasm:



It was an awesome speech, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. It goes against AP's own style guide, which calls for dialect only when its use is compelling.
Which, in this crabby editor's opinion, it was not.

But then, AP is notorious for not following its own guide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. AP is the most racist organization in America.
Edited on Tue Sep-27-11 02:25 PM by AngryAmish
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. In the headline it was intended to belittle Obama and the audience.
In the speech it was intended to belittle the audience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC