Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Regulators Weaken Dodd-Frank Draft Regs, *Allow More Risk* (ProPublica)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 05:14 PM
Original message
Regulators Weaken Dodd-Frank Draft Regs, *Allow More Risk* (ProPublica)
Edited on Tue Sep-27-11 05:22 PM by chill_wind
Meanwhile, against the backdrop of Occupy Wall Street... we see them laboring quietly but ever so feverishly for their own self-interests as always. Always.




Regulators Weaken Dodd-Frank Draft Regs, Allow More Risk

by Marian Wang
Sep. 22, 2011


The regulatory agencies in charge of finalizing some of the most controversial rules mandated by the financial reform law are leaning toward making them looser and more favorable to banks and other traders, according to recent reports in the financial press.

As we noted in June, federal regulators were still puzzling over how restrictive the ban on proprietary trading—banks trading on their own behalf—should be, given that banks are still allowed to hedge against risks. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has argued for banks to be given more leeway in what types of trades would be permitted as hedges under the rule, but critics charge that banks could use the opportunity to take more risks rather than hedge against them.



A draft version of the so-called “Volcker rule” suggests that the ban has been significantly watered down. Here’s the Wall Street Journal:

(The language) opens the door for banks to make all manner of bets on the market, observers said, because a bank might define the risk to its portfolio broadly, such as the risk of a U.S. recession.

If the language is confirmed in the final rule, expected by late October, it would be a victory for Wall Street firms that have lobbied to relax the ban on proprietary trading.




more:

http://www.propublica.org/blog/item/regulators-loosen-limits-on-risk-in-latest-drafts-of-dodd-frank-rules
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Pseudo financial reform to go along with pseudo health
care reform. What a waste of time and effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Reform led by folks who's first priority is to change nothing in the existing order
are frauds by definition, regardless of their intent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. June: A Dodd-Frank Bill's Volcker Rule a Win for Big Banks


Dodd-Frank Bill's Volcker Rule a Win for Big Banks
By Daniel Indiviglio

Jun 25 2010, 1:48 PM ET Comment

Late last night, a revised version of the Volcker rule was passed by Congress' conference committee. It was watered down significantly from its original conception, championed by former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker. It allows banks to invest up to 3% of their tier 1 capital in private equity and hedge funds, but they cannot own more than a 3% ownership stake in any private equity group or hedge fund. The 3% capital threshold is a big enough loophole that most big banks won't have to curb their proprietary trading much, if at all. Moreover, the 3% ownership limit might even make banks riskier.


(snip)


No International Coordination

During conference, Republicans attempted to pass an amendment which would have required more international coordination before these new rules were adopted by U.S. banks. In particular, it would have required a majority of the G-20 nations go along before the rules take effect. Although some countries have indicated that they're open to Volcker rules of their own, there have been no firm commitments. Democrats rejected the amendment, seemingly unworried that American competitiveness could be threatened if other nations don't develop similar regulatory schemes.

It's hard to see how this conception of the Volcker rule does much of anything for financial stability, assuming you believe that a well-constructed Volcker rule would have. Banks can continue to engage in prop trading at approximately the same magnitude as they have in the past. But now, they may be even riskier with less skin in the game and/or more in-house trading.



http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2010/06/dodd-frank-bills-volcker-rule-a-win-for-big-banks/58747/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Lehman examiner says we still haven't learned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thanks for the link Bozita.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. You are welcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. KR and it was super weak to begin with....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC