Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

To hell with the poor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 11:09 AM
Original message
To hell with the poor
To hell with the poor
by Jack Lessenberry | September 28, 2011 - 9:32am
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/node/38645

Throwing all those kids off welfare felt great — until they turned to crime to survive

We have reason to celebrate this weekend: Michigan is cutting off welfare payments forever to nearly 30,000 poor children!

Good thing. Little bastards are eating too much, and if their growth isn't properly stunted and they are allowed to survive, they'll eventually start breeding too. Yes, I know we should castrate them.

Back in the day, we used to do that to Native American children, or the "feebleminded," as long as they weren't from Texas and didn't have family money. But the liberal do-gooders put a stop to that.

Thankfully, the so-called do-gooders haven't been able to stop this new wave of welfare reform, which will only continue to grow in scope because those 30,000 kids are only the start. Beginning Oct. 1, people will be kicked off welfare permanently, every day. That's because in July, the Michigan Legislature passed a law saying you can qualify for welfare cash payments for a maximum of four years. ...

Lifetime. Then you are cut off for good. What if you are badly injured and can't possibly look for a job at the end of that period? What if you have three small children, and absolutely no cash? What if there are no jobs, and hundreds of thousands of others are out of work? (Hey! That's what's happening right now! Who knew?)

Tough titties, kids.

Face facts, poor children of Michigan: Those in power in Lansing believe your low-class parents had no business having sex, let alone having you. If you think the state will save you, think again.

You're on your own.

If you think the above is dripping with sarcasm, you too can be a literary critic. Naturally, our leaders wouldn't put things that honestly. Mike Green, for example, the gauleiter — oops — state senator from someplace up in the thumb called Mayville, put it this way:

"These common sense reforms make sure that limited dollars get to those in need, while encouraging independence and rewarding hard work among able-bodied individuals."

<<snip>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kill the poor!
Oh, kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the poor,
Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the poor,
kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the poor toni-i-i-ight, ni-i-i-ght...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sgpa7wEAz7I
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Holy crap.
Back to the Gilded Age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe if the adults had taken better care of the finances in years past it wouldn't be like this.
It's the adults that suck and the kids that pay. As a society we are so irresponsible that I don't understand how we can look ourselves in the mirror.

Yet it's still who will pay for my retirement and my ever increasing health care costs and you know what the answer is? It's the kids.

We suck. I'm so sick of us us us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. In Mexico they'd get healthcare.
Public health care delivery is accomplished via an elaborate provisioning and delivery system instituted by the Mexican Federal Government. Public health care is provided to all Mexican citizens as guaranteed via Article 4 of the Constitution. Public care is either fully or partially subsidized by the federal government, depending on the person's (Spanish: derechohabiente's) employment status. All Mexican citizens are eligible for subsidized health care regardless of their work status via a system of health care facilities operating under the federal Secretariat of Health (formerly the Secretaria de Salubridad y Asistencia, or SSA) agency.

/snip
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care_in_Mexico
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. My '80s high school history text pointed out welfare was, among other things, a response to crime...
... I specifically remember mention being made of poor farmers hijacking milk trucks.

I'm sure history textbooks have since been "cleaned" of such messy implications— but the ideational linkage persists (http://www.journalofamericanhistory.org/teaching/2011_06/teaching.html)

During the 1930s, changing notions of crime, law, and the state combined with an economic crisis to create paradoxes between punishment and welfare. Like many other aspects of state and society, the politics of punishment underwent significant changes as a result of the Great Depression and the New Deal. Many Americans feared that unemployment and poverty would push more people to commit property crimes such as theft, robbery, and burglary, or to look for work in the underground economy of the liquor trade—illegal until the end of Prohibition in 1933.
...
On the other hand, crime prevention gained new importance in the New Deal administration. During the depression, more Americans understood crime and delinquency not as the product of inherent inmate characteristics, but as the unhappy outcome of social circumstances. In that regard, popular opinion was aligning itself with an academic consensus that had emerged during the 1920s: crime did not stem from the immorality of the individual, experts agreed, but instead was primarily a social disorder that required a social response. Social instability led to increasing levels of crime, they argued. As a result, the preservation and restoration of economic security for families, particularly for young men, could prevent such a dangerous trend.

Young men, especially those from cities, seemed most prone to crime and violence. It was in cities that unemployment was highest, men’s ambitions for success as family providers were most frustrated, and opportunities for crime were plentiful. You can find evidence of this philosophy in excerpts of Roosevelt legislation for the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC).
...


Cut families off welfare permanently after four years... brilliant. Michigan legislators had better hope that veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan don't find themselves unemployed and having family tossed off welfare rolls... I'm sure many have some mad milk-truck hijacking skills by now. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. No jobs, no wealfare - there is only one thing left to do
I expect the crime rate in Michigan will climb due to this brilliant move.

:wtf:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC