Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's a sham! It's all a freaking sham!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Nuclear Unicorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 12:52 PM
Original message
It's a sham! It's all a freaking sham!
Corporate regulations? Government oversight? Financial reform?

DAMMIT this is infuriating!

When you buy and sell stocks based on secrets you learned at the office, it could be insider trading.

But when a United States Senator does it, it's probably perfectly legal.

That's because the SEC has largely determined that trading stocks based on advance knowledge of action in Congress is not insider trading.

If anything, it's "outsider" trading — buying and selling shares based on knowledge of an outside force that's about to hit a company's share value.


http://www.cnbc.com/id/43471561/Congressional_Trading_on_Advance_Info_Not_Illegal_SEC

Their returns were beating Wall Street average by 6 to 10 percent depending on which house the rats served in and, sorry, democrats were just as guilty. We elect them to pass laws to keep us from suffering from the effects of "too big to fail" and all we get is our officials using the laws they pass to enrich themselves.

My hubby is a conservative, I love him dearly but I don't quote him here at DU because we are free to go elsewhere if we want conservative opinion. But I'm going to recite one of his complaints here because it is now my complaint.

Politicians no longer write laws to safeguard our society. They write laws to enrich some and punish those who don't donate enough to the re-election fund. When corporations learn they can cozy up with a politician to cut-out the competition, they will; and when politicians realize they can cozy up with corporations to get rich and get re-elected, they will and as soon as the two merge we have corporatist fascism.

Not a direct quote (he's a lousy speller) but you get his gist. Of course he uses it in the context of divorcing corporations from government and right now I can't see how more government regulation would help because no one is watching the watchdog.

We have to turn these bastards out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. you are right. it IS all a sham and this is just one slice of the whole SHAM PIE
The group also noted that stocks purchased by Democrats outperform stocks purchased by Republicans.


go figger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nuclear Unicorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It's amazing how the Ds and Rs can make a profit for themselves
While driving the rest of us into foreclosed homes, lost jobs and crushing debt.

We literally cannot afford these crooks any longer. I don't want some centralized hyper-controlled nation state that pays lipservice to egalitarianism. If I wanted that the status quo would suffice. We need something new. Heck, I'm even totally cool with the US constitution as it now stands. We need something new.

I dunno if publically financed elections will help but it can't hurt. We need to throw bums out and keep throwing them out without regard to partisanship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. agree but it ain't gona happen without a fight
and by "fight" i mean sacrifice on all our parts

do you think the current crooks are going to change the laws so we can HAVE publicly financed elections? they might as well vote themselves out of office and they know it.

i believe that if enough people push hard enough, the system will roll over. however, the problem is getting enough people to 1) agree on what needs to be done and then 2) agreeing to actually do it. by "it" at this point we mean resistance and by "resistance" I mean direct action (consuming less for one thing) and strategic non-violent civil disobedience. learn to say "no" to authority, often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yup. KNR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Crooked, crooked, crooked.
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC