|
It's bad for the states themselves, as they won't have the influence they hope for if they're all at the beginning. And it's bad for the candidates themselves, as it robs them of the opportunity to get to know parts of the country a little bit at a time, necessitating fly-over campaigning , country-hopping campaigning right from the beginning . .which is bad for the "early" states, too, as they're not going to have much of a chance to actually meet the candidates they're about to vote for. And it robs candidates of the chance to do retail, up-close-and-personal politics. Whether or not Iowa or NH turn out to vote for a candidate who ultimately makes it to the nomination, these states provide a really important opportunity for candidates to actually meet the voters, as people, not as giant crowds. For that reason alone, I think it's really important for keep a bugger between these states and the next batch(and also not MOVE those primaries any earlier than they already are).
|