Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Incomes in the U.S. "unexpectedly" dropped

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:09 AM
Original message
Incomes in the U.S. "unexpectedly" dropped

(Bloomberg) Consumer spending in the U.S. slowed in August as incomes unexpectedly dropped for the first time in almost two years, forcing households to use up savings.

Purchases rose 0.2 percent after a 0.7 percent increase the prior month, Commerce Department figures showed today in Washington. A 0.2 percent advance in prices wiped out the gain in so-called nominal, or unadjusted, spending. Incomes decreased 0.1 percent, the first decline since October 2009.

Little hiring, stagnant wages and a plunge in stocks have shaken confidence in the recovery that began two years ago, which may hurt sales at retailers like Best Buy Co. and Target Corp. The sputtering economy has prompted policy makers from President Barack Obama to the Federal Reserve to take additional action in a bid to prevent another recession.

“There’s not going to be health in consumer spending as long as the employment situation is weak,” said Stephen Stanley, chief economist at Pierpont Securities LLC in Stamford, Connecticut. “The combination of softness on the employment side coupled with a pretty steady increase in prices is causing people to dip into savings.” ...........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-30/consumer-spending-in-u-s-slowed-in-august-as-incomes-unexpectedly-dropped.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Unexpectedly?"
You don't say. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Something tells me those Wall St. douchebags are pouring another toast
and having another laugh at this "unexpected" news...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. I guess they're using the Condi Rice definition of the word "unexpectedly".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. Is the rise in health care insurance costs reflected in this number?
Higher insurance premiums means less take home pay. If calculated like that I can definitely understand how income is decreasing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Somehow, I really doubt it.
Because if they included health care costs in any calculation, the number for the last ten years would be decidedly negative. Nobody except in the top 1% would regularly get the kind of pay raises that would keep up with something like 7, 8, or 9% inflation in health care premiums that has been the norm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. You are probably sadly correct.
Which makes these income numbers less relevant anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Income decreases when consumer spending is low
Because there is less overtime, salespeople get less commissions and hours get cut. That's why you have to have actual demand for the economy to improve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thav Donating Member (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. I highly doubt they measure "take home pay"
Gross pay is easier to measure.

Even if they are measuring gross pay, a dip in that is worse news. Couple a drop in gross pay with rising paycheck deductions (insurance) and you have even LESS in the pockets of consumers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. No, massive unemployment is reflected in this number.
For example, I have a full time job. Until a year ago I also had a 15hr/wk P/T job, working at a movie theater. That job gave me spending money and let me see movies for free. The economy crashed, nobody had movie money, the theater closed, putting me (and 17 other people) out of work. My income dropped by $4,000/yr.

Multiply by 20 million.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
5.  "unexpectedly"
:rofl: Bull Fucking Shit, things are going according to their plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. LOL "unexpectedly" ...yea the rich didn't expect that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
9. SURPRISE!
:eyes: these experts should be joining the unemployment lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
11. I must live in an alternate universe. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
12. When have "economists" ever expected anything?
If this was "unexpected", that just underscores how completely useless their "expertise" is.

Have they bothered to look at such obscure data as the unemployment rate, the housing market and consumer spending? I know that such information isn't readily available or anything, but gee whiz, it might help. So would leaving their offices and doing such things as visiting the grocery store, talking to people and opening a newspaper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
14. Just proves one thing
The Bean Counters have no fucking idea what's going on in the street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC