Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Google censoring the AmpedStatus #OccupyWallStreet report?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 11:56 AM
Original message
Is Google censoring the AmpedStatus #OccupyWallStreet report?
Seems the homesite, ampedstatus.com, isn't showing up when you Google it...

http://ampedstatus.org/google-censors-our-occupywallstreet-report/

Looks like we may have passed the "then they laugh at you" part of "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win" thing (Gandhi). That was quick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oddly enough:
Edited on Fri Sep-30-11 12:07 PM by MineralMan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yet another self-aggrandizing cry of "Censorship! Censorship!"
Some people will do anything to try to attract attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. We don't know yet if it's true or not. Twitter and Yahoo! have already been caught censoring and
youtube had some weird moments yesterday as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. No, we know very obviously that it's not true. Because it's not true.
Don't believe me?

http://www.google.com/search?client=opera&rls=en&q=amped+status&sourceid=opera&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&channel=suggest

It's right there, plain as day, that their claims their site isn't showing up are total bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. It's back. It was not there a minute ago. I checked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's why I phrased the OP as a question: Gotta make sure it's true before saying it is...
But...I don't know why the originating site would not show up in the same day as posted, after searching what did they say, 20 pages deep? Weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I have no idea, but I'd never heard of that site before your post.
The title, however, shows up all over the web, so it's not as though Google is trying to suppress it. Someone may have typed it in wrong or something. It took me 30 seconds to test this and demonstrate that they are incorrect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. As the article points out, many sites DO show the news about the report
but Amped Status as author of report does NOT show up.
ie: the report on the Amped Status page is not linked.
AND
Again, as the article pointed out, Google inadvertently made the report more viral since it shows so many of the other sites that did link to it.
( You DID read the article to see the definition of the problem, yes?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Is this some new "cry wolf" form of advertising? I've seen
"Is (google, facebook,twitter)censoring....." many times lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. And now, this thread is near the top of the search.
Apparently claiming that Google is censoring your site does, indeed, get your site noticed. :rofl:

Maybe I'll try that on my web content writing business site. It might just work.

I could post here about Google censoring my site, and it would soon be posted on Google. Cool idea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Oddly, it didn't also work for ampedstatus.com...this complaint gets hits but not theirs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. For a minute, twitter and yahoo DID censor. We have to make sure it doesn't repeat or spread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. I honestly don't think
Google gives a shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Bingo!
Google doesn't care what's on the web. They just want you to see their ads. Political content is a matter of no interest to Google.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. UPDATE: Searching now brings up ampedstatus.com as the #1 result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. So does that mean that now Google is supporting it?
...:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Evidently. For a minute it appears that they were not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I think you maybe don't understand how google works.
Or maybe how big the internet actually is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Okay, but that would include ampedstatus also not knowing how google works.
I confirmed their finding, perhaps they were wrong? It would be a shame as the report to which they refer is extremely important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC