Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Centrists

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 02:53 PM
Original message
Centrists
I guess the implication is that in the "stupid or lying" spectrum, "they're lying." And their motivation for lying is basically Straussian -- "we can't handle the truth"

The stupid/evil/12 dimensional chess/we're TRYING thing has bothered me for a long time. The Dem elected officials are clearly not stupid. They're not "caving" or negotiating badly. If dumb fucks with a blogger account can see that things aren't working out well for their putative constituency, they get that too.

There has to be an underlying organizing principle for why they would bail out banksters, and fuck over homeowners, why they would subsidize big Pharma at the expense of their base voters. And I think I've finally gotten some of what's going on.

The president, and the Democrat's Senate leadership, reject movement liberalism. The ideology they follow is grounded in the impact of globalization on world capital and labor markets. They believe the US has to reduce labor costs to be competitive as capital flows freely around an interconnected world—that it is unrealistic, “neo-populist” to think the middle class can be preserved. But they also recognize that the middle class is not gonna be happy with these necessary, painful policies:

...

Note that a central theme here is that it is above partisanship—that the experts, left alone, will best do their work. When you use that frame, then the health care negotiation makes sense. These negotiations took place not with politicians, but with the large service providers, because those stakeholders are the real experts and will keep us out of distracting, distorting partisanship. It makes sense that we turn to the money center banks as the mechanism for minimizing the contraction—they’re the pros who have risen, through merit and diligence, to their positions.

http://www.eschatonblog.com/2011/10/centrists.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yep. Only the rich and poor. And never the twain shall meet. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Any 'Democrat' that believes the BS is nothing but a Cool aid drinker and does not deserve a
"Leadership" role.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markpkessinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Unfortunately, there seem to be an awful lot of them out there n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. When I say I am not ever voting for a republican they are who I am talking about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. Can you provide a quote from the President that backs up the claim made in BOLD?
If Obama BELIEVES that .... as the statement indicates ... surely there is a quote in which he says it. Right?

Or ... is the author making an attribution of what THEY believe. If so, the author should say THAT ... the should say MY OPINION, is that Obama BELIEVES .... ".

btw ... the bank bailout start before Obama became President, not after, and yet this author attempts to suggest other.

I BELIEVE that the author has an agenda, and being truthful, isn't part of it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banned from Kos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You're right. TARP did enormous psychological damage to this country.
Never mind that it helped avert a meltdown.

But TARP set the stage for the Tea Party. The right hated it. The left hated the "bailout the banks" aspect of it and rightly so. We all live with it today.

And Bush slipped out in the cover of night once again leaving his baggage with the new president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. Economist Michael Hudson has written and spoken extensively about..
Obama's neoliberal agenda to gut the American middle class by dramatically reducing wages to labor.

http://real-economics.blogspot.com/2011/07/this-may-be-very-long-but-it-is-one-of.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC