|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Mira
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 09:12 PM Original message |
BREAKING NYTimes: WOW - that's a lot of money to forget - Cain accuser got lots of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
1. For the association that's chump change |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mira
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 09:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Of course. Maybe that's why Cain thought it was about 2-3 month's worth and forgot about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 09:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. for a low wage employee facing court and the powerful, that is a lot of money. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 09:23 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. I wrote, from the association's POV. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 09:25 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. sure it is. a hell of a lot less if they made trouble. an easy buy out. and the women go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 09:30 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. That is a different conversation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 09:32 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. payment not indicative of level of harassment.... pure speculation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 09:51 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Let's clarify |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 09:52 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. jeezus fuckin christ.... i was expanding on your damn post. YES, CHUMP change |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 10:30 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. BE. NICE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 07:30 AM Response to Reply #27 |
32. always... i am always nice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 03:03 PM Response to Reply #23 |
52. Funny, I was place my first and only mutual ignore with the poster you are responding to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 10:24 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. It is a small settlement for the company. I suspect there may have been more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 10:27 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Oh I suspect, due to NDA, costs were taken care off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exultant Democracy
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 09:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. As far as a sexual harassment suit it does seem very small. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 09:22 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 02:25 PM Response to Reply #8 |
45. It's probably not as bad a deal as it might look like. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Nikon
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 05:59 PM Response to Reply #45 |
69. Especially if you consider the alternative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 08:12 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. Exactly. Not to mention, filing suit is always an uncertain process. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Nikon
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 05:54 PM Response to Reply #8 |
67. This really doesn't have that much to do with the merits of the case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rustydog
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
2. This is a huge clue in how the 1% live and think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 09:18 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. yup. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsallhappening
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 09:20 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Nafissatou Diallo lied. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 02:20 PM Response to Reply #7 |
44. Something happened in that room. But the powerful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 06:43 PM Response to Reply #44 |
70. Deleted message |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 09:24 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. Thread winner....ding, ding, ding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 09:33 PM Response to Reply #2 |
18. Except there was no case with the IMF guy which we know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 01:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
35. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
6. I'm wondering just when Cain "stepped down" from his position at the organization |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingofalldems
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
12. If someone had to leave their job over something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lint Head
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
14. $35,000 is chump change that a rich prick like Cain could possibly forget. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mira
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 09:29 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Except none of them would ever consider paying if he had not been guilty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillowTree
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 10:33 PM Response to Reply #15 |
28. Nonsense. Corporations pay that much & more every day 'cause it's cheaper than going to court. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
19. Google "average sexual harassment award". $35,000 is way below most awards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Courtesy Flush
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
20. If she only made $35k per year, she's not a reliable source |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
21. Why is this legal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 10:33 PM Response to Reply #21 |
29. Why is what legal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 10:46 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Cain should pay, not the association. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 12:49 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. What difference does it make? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 01:14 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Because one is a punishment to the perp and the other is a get out of jail free card. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 01:19 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. So if you are ever seeking monetary damages... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 01:40 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Another lawyer who doesn't get it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whiskeytide
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 01:56 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Uh oh - Now I gotta defend us lawyers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 02:42 PM Response to Reply #39 |
47. Oh, I see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whiskeytide
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 03:14 PM Response to Reply #47 |
54. Just so we keep the record straight... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 03:31 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. You are confusing two things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whiskeytide
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 09:31 AM Response to Reply #56 |
73. The influence of the tort reform movement... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scruffy1
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 04:25 PM Response to Reply #36 |
64. The lawyer is correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 05:56 PM Response to Reply #64 |
68. Yes, financial status of the claimant will affect settlement value for those reasons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yawnmaster
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 02:53 PM Response to Reply #31 |
48. this was a settlement not a judgement after civil trial. It likely wasn't Cain's... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 02:58 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. This is why I don't think paying hush money should be legal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yawnmaster
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 03:02 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. I too think there are problems with it, as it does hide the truth...in some cases... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whiskeytide
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 03:28 PM Response to Reply #49 |
55. If you have a better system, I'm... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 03:44 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. Make the perp pay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 03:57 PM Response to Reply #57 |
60. In other words - "Give the victim nothing" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 03:58 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. We're talking about a real case where the perp could easily pay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #61 |
63. The victim made a decision not to do that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whiskeytide
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 09:09 AM Response to Reply #61 |
72. So you want to re-vamp... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 03:48 PM Response to Reply #49 |
58. First off - it is illegal to pay to cover up 'crimes' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firehorse
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 01:20 PM Response to Reply #29 |
37. It's hush money. The amount doesn't matter. It's too expensive for a low wage worker to pay legal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 02:35 PM Response to Reply #37 |
46. Not with a strong case and a contingent fee lawyer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firehorse
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 03:52 PM Response to Reply #46 |
59. You get what you pay for. Contingency fee lawyers sound great but do they have what it takes to go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 04:11 PM Response to Reply #59 |
62. The cost of a lawyer doesn't change the merit of a case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firehorse
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 04:48 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. What kind of evidence is needed to win a sexual harrasment case? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 05:42 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. It depends on the case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillowTree
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 10:34 PM Response to Reply #21 |
30. Why is what legal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
24. That is not severance pay! That is something else. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firehorse
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 01:22 PM Response to Reply #24 |
38. yes the something else is hush money. *sorry to repeat* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
40. Cain shoulda put a sock on it before we put a sock on his campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iRidiculous
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 03:05 PM Response to Reply #40 |
53. Cain's done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
42. I'm surprised Bush didn't appoint Cain to the Supreme Court. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Douglas Carpenter
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
43. "Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution." - 2 Timothy 3:12 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
50. His "reculat'n" isn't so good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC