|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
cleanhippie
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:07 AM Original message |
New Police Drone Near Houston Could Carry Weapons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
1. I wonder if those devices have a self-destruct sequence installed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cirque du So-What
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
2. I don't trust cops to practice discretion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tippy
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
3. This may not be the first step in border control but it won't be the last |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KeepItReal
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 12:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
27. Houston ain't near nobody's border... Unless you count the Gulf of Mexico as one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lint Head
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
4. Here we go folks. This shit needs to stop. Innocent people will die. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:28 AM Response to Reply #4 |
13. It is unarmed. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lint Head
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 11:10 AM Response to Reply #13 |
23. For now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dtexdem
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
5. You mean the drones will go from concealed carry to open carry? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
6. Considering you can get a decent helicopter for less than $1 million, I'd say they were taken. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:16 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. More like $2 million when you add all the sensors and comm gear. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:20 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Eh, a couple-year old Bell equipped wouldn't be that much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:28 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. The Eurocopter AS350 is what I used as my baseline |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
7. The taxpayer paid $300,000 for this nasty little thing? DHS contractor racket. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:20 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. That sounds right - I am sure the operator training is part of the cost. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:37 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Or, for $169.95 they could have had this. Missiles already included. No training required. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 11:03 AM Response to Reply #15 |
21. Got it - my mistake, thought you wanted a serious discussion. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 12:54 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. $300k is still a ripoff of the taxpayer for that thing. To me, that's serious money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
11. I wonder if an IR laser pen could blind the IR camera. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:30 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. The Army's experience in combat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:46 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. That doesn't mean that some good old boy with a varmit rifle won't try...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 11:04 AM Response to Reply #17 |
22. How many 70 mph ground hogs have you seen lately? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 03:45 PM Response to Reply #22 |
35. It is a small helicopter which means it will hover at times and be a sitting duck. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 03:57 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. What are the odds that it is within range |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dembotoz
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 03:49 PM Response to Reply #14 |
36. wonder what the penalty would be?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ret5hd
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 11:14 AM Response to Reply #11 |
25. Or jam the comms and let it crash. (easier, i'd think) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 12:58 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Line of sight comms are hard to jam |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 02:01 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. The technology for this is very off-the-shelf, and can be replicated for far less. $300K is porky |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 03:53 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. You do if you are flying over populated areas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg
![]() |
Fri Nov-04-11 09:52 AM Response to Reply #37 |
41. Border patrol is mostly over unpopulated areas, anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Fri Nov-04-11 01:12 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Montgomery County includes Houston |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg
![]() |
Fri Nov-04-11 01:51 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. How do you know so much about this drone? How do you know it's not on a relay control system? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Fri Nov-04-11 03:06 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. So more expensive helicopters are the answer? OK nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg
![]() |
Fri Nov-04-11 03:11 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. I clearly said this is an option to police choppers, but far too costly for what it does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
16. "To be in on the ground floor of this is pretty exciting for us here in Montgomery County," Sheriff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
18. Could be a big problem for small private aircraft...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Manifestor_of_Light
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 03:27 PM Response to Reply #18 |
33. Several airports nearby. Hooks Field and Intergalactic are two. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eShirl
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
19. "It'll be used for situations we have with criminals." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
20. I'm guessing my definition of "criminal" and the Sheriff Tommy's are very different. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
24. Coming soon to a neighborhood near you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eShirl
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
26. I have two words: Drug War. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
30. The President can simply declare any one of us a national security threat, and kill us via RC, no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 01:56 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Not sure we really want to know the answer to that, if indeed there is a real distinction anymore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shagbark Hickory
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
34. The latest tool for catching speeders. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurityOfEssence
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
39. Let's call it the Philadelphia Flier |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire Walk With Me
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
40. Two words I saw on the net: "Taser drone". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC