|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
HopeHoops (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-10-11 08:32 AM Original message |
Poll question: Is there ANY chance that the GOP will come up with a serious candidate for 2012? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Safetykitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-10-11 08:34 AM Response to Original message |
1. For "no-serious" candidates, one is going to beat Obama...seriously....and very sad it will happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-10-11 08:44 AM Response to Reply #1 |
9. "very sad". LOL... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-10-11 10:30 AM Response to Reply #1 |
19. LOL! A mockable comment. Maybe you mistyped? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
INdemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-10-11 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
2. Diebold can do a lot for a Teabagger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lurks Often (505 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-10-11 08:38 AM Response to Original message |
3. Just because you and others here on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-10-11 08:39 AM Response to Original message |
4. No. Its too late in the game now and if a potential candidate was 'serious' they'd know it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeHoops (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-10-11 08:48 AM Response to Reply #4 |
11. Why not? That's basically what Mondale did and he....and he...shit. Never mind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-10-11 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
5. they know Mitt is It, but they cant stand it. He has all the excitement of a bowl of tomato soup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-10-11 10:21 AM Response to Reply #5 |
18. Tomato soup is more exciting than Mitt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stellanoir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-10-11 08:41 AM Response to Original message |
6. I've a very strong suspicion that the stage is set |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nineteen50 (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-10-11 08:43 AM Response to Original message |
7. He is already in the Whitehouse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-10-11 10:31 AM Response to Reply #7 |
20. LOL! Another mockable comment. But parr for the course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-10-11 08:43 AM Response to Original message |
8. No. Obama will win 2012 easily... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeHoops (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-10-11 08:50 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. That's what I think. They're thining the herd by sacrificing the major clowns. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chorophyll (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-10-11 08:47 AM Response to Original message |
10. I think they're trying to throw this election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-10-11 08:51 AM Response to Original message |
13. I don't know as they have one that isn't ethically challenged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeHoops (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-10-11 08:52 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Well, at least not at the federal level. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Philosopher King (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-10-11 09:15 AM Response to Original message |
15. It depends on what you mean by serious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeHoops (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-10-11 09:17 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Do they have to wear wigs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Philosopher King (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-11 07:44 AM Response to Reply #16 |
21. I'm sure they would if they thought that would make you take them seriously. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zbdent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-10-11 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
17. No, but ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC