|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 06:30 PM Original message |
The Second Mile Foundation had to know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wryter2000
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
1. They need to find out who the donors are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 06:34 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. And investigate the people at the Foundation! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
28. They were told in 2002 that the matter had been investigated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:44 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. He and his wife get salaries of over $100,000 a year each |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:50 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. Yes, they are in charge. But if Curly lied to them, how would they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:56 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. Paterno was listed as on the Board of Directors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:59 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Why would you think that Paterno would have told them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:03 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. Sandusky FOUNDED the place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:07 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. So? They didn't know he was an alleged rapist then. Since the University Police never followed up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:10 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. This article states they knew |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:14 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. That writer based his conclusion, I think, on the fact that Penn State |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:35 PM Response to Reply #49 |
71. That's an assumption |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:53 PM Response to Reply #71 |
83. Correct, we don't know. But a lot of people here are jumping to conclusions that we do. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
39. You're not saying the donors committed horrible crimes, are you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:00 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. I'm sure they are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:06 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. There is no evidence that I have seen that TSM knew anything beyond |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:14 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. I'll link it again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:16 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. Of course this is a monumentally awful thing -- but that doesn't mean the TSM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:25 PM Response to Reply #51 |
58. I don't buy it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:18 PM Response to Reply #1 |
52. My ONLY question: WAS POPPY BUSH ONE OF THESE DONORS??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:21 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. It wouldn't surprise me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadrasT
![]() |
Fri Nov-11-11 10:51 AM Response to Reply #1 |
102. Donors are listed in the 2010 annual report |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
3. For that matter, Paterno is on their board of directors. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 06:40 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. OMG |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thewiseguy
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 06:47 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Arnold Palmer, Andy Reid, and Dick Vermeil are also on their board of directors... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:42 PM Response to Reply #10 |
30. The abuse of one boy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
justiceischeap
![]() |
Fri Nov-11-11 11:38 AM Response to Reply #10 |
103. I'm not trying to give anyone a pass but honorary board members |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:02 PM Response to Reply #4 |
16. Yep. There's really no plausible scenario where he DIDN'T know something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:23 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Good grief. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:26 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Well... they DID take his keys away... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:30 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Gee, taking his keys away was a really great way to handle it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:37 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. I agree entirely. That, for me, is the dead giveaway part. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Huey P. Long
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
5. Sure they did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 06:47 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Well they are just as guilty as everyone else of covering it up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
6. Are you sure Sandusky was arrested in 1998? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 06:46 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Well I'm sure he went down to the police station at least once |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDebbieDee
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
8. In the early 90s, I read a work of fiction (by Jonathan Kellerman, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 06:49 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Probably some of them did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:03 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. They've been described as "at risk" kids in need of "positive human contact." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
11. Sandusky was not arrested in 1998 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:29 PM Response to Reply #11 |
22. They DEFINITELY need to be on the chopping block |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:33 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. I don't give much weight to the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:40 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. The Second Mile knew |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:45 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. Curly lied to the Grand Jury and he told the same lie to The Second Mile. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:52 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. Or vice versa: was he told in his capacity as counsel to TSM, or PSU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:55 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Since the investigation was done through Penn State, he would have learned of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:19 PM Response to Reply #36 |
53. Indeed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:21 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. Yes, the attorney did know. But he was bound by confidentiality, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:26 PM Response to Reply #54 |
62. It's not clear that he was bound by confidentiality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:28 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. I don't and neither does anyone else here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:52 PM Response to Reply #65 |
82. Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:57 PM Response to Reply #82 |
85. I guess what I hate to see is a whole organization smeared because of the actions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 09:10 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. I don't want to see a whole organization smeared |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:34 PM Response to Reply #62 |
70. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:49 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. The article notes that Wendell Courtney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:30 PM Response to Reply #34 |
66. Not to mention the disappearing DA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:15 PM Response to Reply #24 |
50. the presentment says that Schultz knew about the '98 investigation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:32 PM Response to Reply #50 |
67. Schultz was with Penn State, not TSM. Right? And that investigation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 09:18 PM Response to Reply #67 |
90. yes on both counts n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rageneau
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
13. This Second Mile Foundation deserves a second look. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:00 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. So these "role models" pay this organization for access to these young boys? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:34 PM Response to Reply #13 |
25. You're not reading the same website I am then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:47 PM Response to Reply #13 |
33. And they have close to $10M in assets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
14. People may not like it, but I think the "charitible organization" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Berlin Expat
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:59 PM Response to Reply #14 |
41. That's the hot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:25 PM Response to Reply #41 |
60. I'd love to see a donor list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:27 PM Response to Reply #41 |
64. Was Poppy Bush one of those big donors??????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:35 PM Response to Reply #64 |
72. That thought has crossed my mind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:26 PM Response to Reply #14 |
61. People aren't gonna like it, but I think you are dead on, and furthermore, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
20. They only knew what Curley told them, and he lied. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingofalldems
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
21. Looks like a Special Prosecutor will be required |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
26. As another DUer pointed out, this is about a lack of empathy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thewiseguy
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
47. According to Washington Post, The organization was notified in 2002 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:23 PM Response to Reply #47 |
57. Penn State's Curley lied to them, the same way he lied to the Grand Jury |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thewiseguy
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:33 PM Response to Reply #57 |
68. Sorry but that is just bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:36 PM Response to Reply #68 |
73. There is no evidence that TSM was told about the 1998 investigation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thewiseguy
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:39 PM Response to Reply #73 |
74. Are you really that naive? Why do you think Sandusky resigned abruptly in 1999? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:47 PM Response to Reply #74 |
78. I think many if not all of the trustees could have been that trusting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
56. Maybe some high officials were also pedophiles. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:27 PM Response to Reply #56 |
63. Great. Why should anyone ever start a foundation to help children |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:40 PM Response to Reply #63 |
76. I was very specifically speaking about Sandusky |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:50 PM Response to Reply #76 |
79. Okay, I thought you were talking about the current leadership. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 09:16 PM Response to Reply #79 |
89. And it's a shame |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 09:20 PM Response to Reply #89 |
92. I agree, but it's harder than you think. I assume that organization |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:40 PM Response to Reply #56 |
75. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:51 PM Response to Reply #75 |
80. The Board members are volunteers who aren't getting paid for anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 09:20 PM Response to Reply #80 |
91. I'm talking about people that are deeply involved |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 09:24 PM Response to Reply #91 |
93. Not just the Honorary Board. I doubt that most people on the State Board |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Safetykitten
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
59. Oh they knew alright. Oh yes they did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gin
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:42 PM Response to Reply #59 |
77. are the Sanduskys CEO & VP of TSM? if so,,,,that will hurt if that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
69. it's Sandusky's foundation and a front |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:52 PM Response to Reply #69 |
81. He started it but it hasn't been "his" for years. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 09:13 PM Response to Reply #81 |
87. So? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 09:16 PM Response to Reply #87 |
88. But there's no evidence that TSM knew about the 1998 allegations, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 09:52 PM Response to Reply #88 |
99. Oh yes there is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 11:20 PM Response to Reply #99 |
101. Yeah, and you had a feeling about those evil Duke students too, didn't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 09:27 PM Response to Reply #69 |
95. That is my suspicion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
84. Yeah, them and the local police. How many times did they need to investigate this guy before... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 09:24 PM Response to Reply #84 |
94. I got that wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 09:30 PM Response to Reply #94 |
96. Yeah, reading the Grand Jury report, I am most shocked by how many times he was investigated but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 09:44 PM Response to Reply #96 |
98. Well, between that and the DA that went missing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 09:31 PM Response to Reply #94 |
97. That is the big question. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch
![]() |
Thu Nov-10-11 10:05 PM Response to Reply #94 |
100. because the improper behavior didn't constitute a crime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC