|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
elehhhhna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-13-11 10:53 AM Original message |
Why did Jerry Sandusky's wife call abuse victim weeks before his testimony |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cirque du So-What (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-13-11 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
1. I believe Dorothy Sandusky should be charged separately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-13-11 12:11 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. No matter how Mrs. Sandusky is charged, she cannot be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-13-11 04:26 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Not quite accurate. See, Commonwealth v. Spetzer, in PA, she can be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cirque du So-What (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-13-11 01:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
13. I realize what you're saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-13-11 04:30 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. She can be compelled to give incriminating evidence against her husband in PA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-13-11 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
2. Deleted message |
Botany (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-13-11 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
3. She had to know about "it" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firehorse (547 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-13-11 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
4. Self interest. Probably worried about messing up the status quo of her income, name, etc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-13-11 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
5. Sandusky and wife were spotted at the gym working out yesterday morning... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-13-11 11:30 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Many years of deep denial. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tuckessee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-13-11 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
7. Was she tipped off about the grand jury investigation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-13-11 12:18 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. it's been public knowledge since the end of March |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-13-11 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
8. Probably to try to get him not to testify, I would imagine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tnvoter (75 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-13-11 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
11. She was doing her husband's bidding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tnlefty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-13-11 04:15 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Welcome tnvoter!! I found this yesterday after seeing part of an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-13-11 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
12. Auto-Unrec for citing the Daily Mail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-13-11 04:34 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. I've seen it on the local news here, and other written sources. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-13-11 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
15. Maybe Ginny Thomas told her it was a good thing to do? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:41 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC