Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DVR Alert: Insider trading is perfectly legal for Congresscritters - 60 Minutes tonight

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 02:50 PM
Original message
DVR Alert: Insider trading is perfectly legal for Congresscritters - 60 Minutes tonight
Edited on Sun Nov-13-11 02:51 PM by Bozita
November 11, 2011 1:12 PM
Congress insiders: Above the law?
77 Comments
Watch the Segment »

(CBS News) Martha Stewart went to jail for it. Hedge fund honcho Raj Rajaratnam was fined $92 million and will go to jail for years for it. But members of Congress can do the same thing -use non-public information to make stock trades -- and there's no law against it. Steve Kroft reports on how America's lawmakers can legally make tidy profits on information only they know, simply because they won't pass a law against themselves. The report will be broadcast on Sunday, Nov. 13 at 7 p.m. ET/PT.

Among the revelations in Kroft's report:

* Members of Congress have bought stock in companies while laws that could affect those companies were being debated in the House or Senate.

* At least one representative made significant stock purchases the day after he and other members of Congress attended a secret meeting in September 2008, where the Fed chair and the treasury secretary informed them of the imminent global economic meltdown.
The meeting was so confidential that cell phones and other digital devices were confiscated before it began.

If senators and representatives are using non-public information to win in the market, it's all legal says Peter Schweizer, who works for the Hoover Institute, a conservative think tank. He has been examining these issues for some time and has written about them in a book, "Throw them All Out." "(Insider trading laws) apply to corporate executives, to Americans...If you are a member of Congress, those laws are deemed not to apply," he tells Kroft. "It's really the way the rules have been defined...have conveniently written them in such a way as they don't apply to themselves," says Schweizer.

more...
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18560_162-57323221/congress-insiders-above-the-law/?tag=contentMain;cbsCarousel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Electric Monk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Seems like that might be a good thing to put on Facebook..
I don't have an account though..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
28. Somebody, PLEASE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. I once read a startling statistic
It said that on average, a savvy investor can make about 2% per year increasing his net worth. A particularly savvy professional trader can realize about 6% per year.

Members of Congress average 12% per year, savvy or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. This scandal calls for a national referendum, aka "People's Veto" of legalized white-collar crime
Since Congress won't pass laws exempting themselves from laws that apply to everybody else, we'll have to do it for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. The problem is that the 60 Minutes source is a Breitbart associate
Edited on Sun Nov-13-11 05:27 PM by alp227
From Media Matters: "Pelosi Smear Reportedly Based On Book By Breitbart Editor" quoting the SF Chronicle "Pelosi's investments questioned in CBS report": "Pelosi's office said "60 Minutes" told her staff that the report was based on a book by conservative writer Peter Schweizer, a fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, who earlier had accused the Pelosis of hypocrisy for hiring non-union labor at their Napa vineyard." Additionally, Schweizer edits the Breitbart blog BigPeace.com and is a research fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution, whose fellows also include Thomas Sowell, Victor Davis Hanson, and Gary Becker.

(That RW talking point about Pelosi's vineyard is garbage as Pelosi paid her workers more than unionized workers' average, see this KGO ABC7 report "Pelosi's Napa Business Scrutinized")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Greed is a nonpartisan sport.
There is plenty of dirt to dish on both sides of the aisle. Greed is a sustainable commodity - they'll never run out it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. That was my impression also from the report.
They talked about Hastert's real estate deal and other manipulations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhaTHellsgoingonhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Fmr. Rep Baird, author of bill, is a Democrat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Brian Baird from Washington
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. Only one Repub cosponsor, the rest are Dems. They also talked about political intelligence firms ...
http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/taxonomy/term/political-intelligence/

"On the intersection of K Street and Wall Street lies the burgeoning “political intelligence” industry, where lobbyists, advisors and other DC insiders use their campaign contributions, connections and clout not to shape legislation, but to make investment decisions.

...The political intelligence industry relies on remaining in the shadows. The website for one firm that specializes in political intelligence notes,

Our political intelligence operation differs from standard 'lobbying' in that the OSINT Group is not looking to influence legislation on behalf of clients, but rather provide unique 'monitoring' of information through our personal relationships between lawmakers, staffers, and lobbyists working the K Street - Pennsylvania Avenue corridor. Providing this service for clients who do not want their interest in an issue publicly known is an activity that does not need to be reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA), thus providing an additional layer of confidentiality for our clients.

If the STOCK Act passes, the “additional layer of confidentiality” will disappear, helping to ensure that insider information is not driving investment decisions for a few, leaving the rest of us in the dark."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Electric Monk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. Thanks, on now. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. OH MY GOD! A new sign needs to go over the door to Congress - "Incest is best"
Edited on Sun Nov-13-11 07:26 PM by Dover
The level of corruption runs sooooooooooooooooooooooooooo deep, is sooooooooooooooooooooooo insideous,
and soooooooooooooooooooooooooooo tied up in corporations/finance, I don't see how to save our government.
They have shown up at the trough of crony captialism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. It IS a nightmare of almost incomprehensible proportions.
These people are perfectly content to keep things just the way they are.

Occupy Everywhere!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #15
27. Finally, the masks are coming off.
That's the positive side of the nightmare.

We can't change what we don't acknowledge.

Occupy the Vampire Squid!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rdking647 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. can we just vote them all out????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. And then what?
Power corrupts. WE are all going to have to change this corrosive tendency toward greed before we can hope to change the system. Otherwise it will continue to show up in any system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. This needs to change.
Edited on Sun Nov-13-11 07:28 PM by Ilsa
The possible manipulation of legislation for personal profit is appalling.

The use of insider information for personal profit should be equally illegal.

They really live by another setoff rules. No shared sacrifice financially, either. Their bennies are saved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. They mentioned this bill, HR 1148 to prohibit members of Congress...
Edited on Sun Nov-13-11 07:38 PM by slipslidingaway
from trading on knowledge that is not in the public domain.

Cosponsors have now grown to 9 since first being introduced.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h112-1148

"To prohibit commodities and securities trading based on nonpublic information relating to Congress, to require additional reporting by Members and employees of Congress of securities transactions, and for other purposes."


http://insidertrading.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=002391

"May 16, 2007

Reps. Baird and Slaughter Reintroduce STOCK Act in 110th Congress

"In an effort to strengthen ethical standards and conduct in the U.S. House of Representatives, Congresswoman Louise Slaughter (NY-28), Chair of the House Rules Committee, and Congressman Brian Baird (WA-03) today re-introduced legislation to stop insider trading on Capitol Hill.

The original version of the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act (STOCK Act) was introduced last year by Reps. Baird and Slaughter. The new version introduced today has been strengthened to apply to all employees of the executive branch, in addition to Congressional staffers and Members of Congress."


http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/taxonomy/term/political-intelligence/

"On the intersection of K Street and Wall Street lies the burgeoning “political intelligence” industry, where lobbyists, advisors and other DC insiders use their campaign contributions, connections and clout not to shape legislation, but to make investment decisions. The Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act, H.R. 1148, introduced by Representatives Walz and Slaughter would shed some light on political intelligence activities by requiring firms that specialize in gathering nonpublic information from Hill sources to register with the House and Senate, as lobbying firms are required to do. The bill also creates rules to tamp down the occurrence of insider trading by members of Congress.

It’s no wonder that savvy investors at hedge funds look to Washington insiders to help them decide to buy or sell stocks. Will a bankruptcy bill help or hurt credit card companies? Will offshore oil drilling be allowed? Will legislation to address antitrust claims be introduced? Is the pharmaceutical industry going to face new regulations? What Congress does matters very much to the business world, and early, nonpublic information about the way Congress will impact any business or industry can lead to huge profits for investors.

The political intelligence industry relies on remaining in the shadows. The website for one firm that specializes in political intelligence notes,

Our political intelligence operation differs from standard 'lobbying' in that the OSINT Group is not looking to influence legislation on behalf of clients, but rather provide unique 'monitoring' of information through our personal relationships between lawmakers, staffers, and lobbyists working the K Street - Pennsylvania Avenue corridor. Providing this service for clients who do not want their interest in an issue publicly known is an activity that does not need to be reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA), thus providing an additional layer of confidentiality for our clients..."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. First bill H.R. 5015 introduced in 2006 and strengthened in 2007 under the new bill...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
31. Thank you for this post. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. You're welcome :))) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
17. Watching
Interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sixmile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
19. Executive Order
Use it, Mr. President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. You funny..
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
24. K/R
Watching this made me sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
25. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
26. At some point we will have crested the 50% point on the way to total fascism.
That point may be behind us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. Oh it is definitely behind us.
Weasels have been ripping the flesh of the Middle Class for so long, some deem it normal activity.

But it is definitely fascism, and Zappa would be writing a slammin' tune or two about it if he were still around.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
29. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
JudyM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
30. Also abhorrent is the fact of congressfolks sharing insider info with hedge fund mgrs
which was also mentioned in the 60 Minutes piece... meaning that they and their clients then also have the benefit. Are they exempt from prosecution, as well, for trading on this insider info? Certainly they shouldn't be, and at a very minimum there must be a reporting requirement for congress. Plus it should still be a crime for congressfolks to share this insider info, even if they are allowed to trade on it!

We desperately need a new law that requires congress to live by the laws the rest of us live by. This is just... a gross lack of ethics. How I wish the Occupy movement had some legs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
34. K&R...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC