|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Are_grits_groceries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:42 AM Original message |
McQueary claims he did stop Sandusky: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabatha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
1. Bob Costas (?) had a report on it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleanhippie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:47 AM Original message |
McQueary is full of shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lbrtbell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
11. +1 - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dtexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
25. McQueary didn't do what he should have; but too many stones are being tossed his way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beac (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 06:14 PM Response to Reply #25 |
36. Except that McQueary wasn't a "whistleblower" b/c Sandusky wasn't a PSU employee at the time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:26 PM Response to Reply #36 |
42. Do you have any proof that McQueary supported Sandusky's foundation? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue37 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:41 PM Response to Reply #42 |
48. I have read that he continued to show up at their functions and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:43 PM Original message |
Where? My own google search show no hits that McQueary was involved in the 2nd Mile foundation. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beac (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:48 PM Response to Reply #42 |
55. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:42 PM Response to Reply #36 |
51. he is a former employee and PSU had some control over his actions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleanhippie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:17 PM Response to Reply #25 |
38. I respect your opinion, but that is total bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:27 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. McQueary himself says he did report it. But the chief of police is now indicted for perjury |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleanhippie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:31 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. I had not heard that. If that is the case... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:42 PM Response to Reply #46 |
50. Sandusky was investigated by a couple different agencies IIRC, and never charged. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uponit7771 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
26. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
29. Agreed. Prosecutors still don't know the identity of the victim... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
global1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 01:43 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Did I Hear Right In The Costas Interview He Spoke With The Lawyer And He Said..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 04:17 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Ruh roh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:44 PM Response to Reply #30 |
53. I didn't hear that part, and I've heard bits and pieces on several MSNBC shows. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
35. Deleted message |
cleanhippie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:18 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. Win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barbtries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
2. i just heard this this morning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Are_grits_groceries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:52 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. I'm skeptical too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
3. "Hey! Knock that off! Take that out of his ass and go back to showering! Ok, gotta jet!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 11:20 AM Response to Reply #3 |
12. There's all kinds of stuff wrong with the Victim #2 narrative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 11:23 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. I am not an expert on the case but as my fictitious quote pointed out, there are some... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 11:33 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Curiouser and curiouser is right. Like you, I believe McQueary may be able to pick out the boy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beac (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 06:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
37. Sandusky may have really stepped in it if he's claiming he knows who McQueary saw him with. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:23 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. If the kid comes in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beac (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:46 PM Response to Reply #41 |
54. With that ONE count. Remember there are seven others in the indictment and 10 more victims |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 11:12 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. With whatever number of counts are tued to that incident |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
4. Could simply be his PR ploy now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 11:46 AM Response to Reply #4 |
23. Here's what the Curley and Schultz defense will likely go with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
5. Could simply be his PR ploy now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Myrina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
7. Bzzzt, wrong answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melissaf (307 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:43 PM Response to Reply #7 |
52. Grand jury REPORT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
8. So if he stopped it, as he said, why did he leave the boy there? Did it .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 11:18 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Bingo: Any reasonable, intentional, intervention would have involved removing the boy to safety. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:29 PM Response to Reply #8 |
45. Uhm, or the boy ran away. I'd run away if the offender were suddenly interrupted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politicalboi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
9. So what happened to the boy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johonny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
13. McQueary is a key witness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 11:23 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Grand jury testimony will be revealed in discovery, at the latest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
16. He obviously allowed Sandusky to leave with the child. He didn't stop it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 11:38 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. How do you know that? It's not in the Grand Jury report. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 11:40 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Simple deduction. They don't know who the kid is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 11:57 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. It's all getting very weird. McQueary's statements are certainly going to fuel the speculation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
18. It puts things in a different light for McQueary, but not a BETTER one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
19. 'quick, tough decisions' what is so tough about stopping a pedophile and calling the cops? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
21. He stopped it ONCE!!! But his silence allowed Sandusky to do it again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
27. An investigation/discovery/trial will hopefully shed some light on this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
taught_me_patience (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
28. McQueary is trying to save his career (or life). n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MerryBlooms (940 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
31. Child services was contacted and then decided it wasn't an actionable incident - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 04:53 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Child services was contacted on the 2002 incident? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MerryBlooms (940 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 05:36 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. 1998 and then he retired in 1999, but retained access to Penn facilities. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:22 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. Right. I know the story..I thought this was adding new info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:29 PM Response to Reply #31 |
44. That fits in well with the pattern of Sandusky being repeatedly investigated and never charged. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
47. it doesn't sound like it stopped. there's 10 more victims coming forward |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melissaf (307 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-15-11 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
49. What makes me uncomfortable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC