|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
MgtPA
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 12:41 PM Original message |
Judge who issued injunction to stop Zuccoti evictions removed from case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
1. what the hell? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MgtPA
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 12:43 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. TPTB |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backtoblue
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 12:43 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. I know right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rubberducky
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
3. This is a big f------ deal! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 12:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. feels like Soviet Union spirit to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 09:52 AM Response to Reply #6 |
71. Fascism. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fasttense
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 10:47 AM Response to Reply #3 |
79. This is just the start....The 1% will not allow their purchase to be devalued |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
5. Paging Mr Kafka.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Viva_Daddy
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
7. So much for "the rule of law" ...if the 1% allows it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dipsydoodle
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
8. That's the problem with tactics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ljm2002
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
9. That's pretty blatant... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 02:44 AM Response to Reply #9 |
56. Who made up the list? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 11:05 AM Response to Reply #9 |
81. OWS handpicked this judge when they went to her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ut oh
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 11:08 AM Response to Reply #81 |
82. Where is the evidence of this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 11:17 AM Response to Reply #82 |
84. "Lawyers for Occupy Wall Street phoned Billings after cops moved into Zuccotti Park" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chan790
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 11:13 AM Response to Reply #81 |
83. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 11:21 AM Response to Reply #83 |
85. But there is no evidence that this particular case was handled differently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capitalocracy
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
10. I wonder if any other judges were excluded from the list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
11. That's scary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 10:19 PM Response to Reply #11 |
47. The scariest part of the entire story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
12. WTF! How can they do that? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 01:10 PM Response to Reply #12 |
22. This is what Bloomberg must have been alluding to here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 02:10 PM Response to Reply #22 |
31. So Bloomie can ignore a court order? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 02:32 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. It demonstrates the connections that the 1% have in our justice system. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dotymed
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 10:18 AM Response to Reply #22 |
75. This should re-energize the OWS movement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
13. And now we enter a whole new level |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capitalocracy
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 12:55 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. By all means, please use it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fawke Em
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 02:04 PM Response to Reply #13 |
29. Fascism? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xiamiam
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
14. that is totally f'ed up..nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hifiguy
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
15. That stinks to high heaven. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RegieRocker
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
16. Democracy my ass!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
supernova
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
17. Why was she removed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capitalocracy
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 12:58 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. "Because she usually handles real estate cases." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
booley
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 01:12 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. how is that relevant? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capitalocracy
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 01:13 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Yeah, I have no idea, that's all it says in the article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 04:20 PM Response to Reply #20 |
38. Technically |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 10:20 PM Response to Reply #20 |
48. And yesterday 3 supreme court justuces were hanging out with the industries they are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capitalocracy
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 10:49 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. As long as they don't usually deal with real estate cases... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 11:09 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. You are amking me laugh now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
19. That is a very disturbing development. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
21. Wow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
23. A Tuesday Morning Massacre. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PoliticAverse
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
26. Can you continue to 'randomly' pick one until you get one that does what you want ? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtrockville
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 01:59 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. I don't see why not. Who could stop it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire Walk With Me
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 02:04 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. Sure must be fucking nice! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
justiceischeap
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
28. So they wanted a pool of judges willing to break the law. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
socialist_n_TN
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
32. Judge shopping anyone? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
33. Wow...they're not even bothering to TRY and be discreet anymore are they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
34. This seems to have the makings of a major conspiracy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MgtPA
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 03:35 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Yes, coordinated effort on their part. Bloomberg probably wanted to get the evictions wrapped up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
37. ACLU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AzDar
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
39. Jeez. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadMaddie
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
40. This is why electing Millionaires like Bloomberg and Ahhrnold |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
41. It isn't being reported |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
42. That is vile, disturbing news. k&r for exposure. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DirkGently
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
43. Judge shopping. NIce. So democratic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 10:10 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
44. Oh but meanwhile back at the ranch SCOTUS fuckwads cannot apparently be removed for obvious conflict |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
![]() |
Tue Nov-15-11 10:09 PM Response to Original message |
45. Sounds like a conspiracy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 01:10 AM Response to Original message |
51. This reminds me how judge Reggie Walton was "randomly assigned" to TWO Sibel Edmonds court cases... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harmony Blue
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 01:30 AM Response to Original message |
52. We must remember this day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 02:55 AM Response to Reply #52 |
58. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 10:45 AM Response to Reply #52 |
78. As was 12/12/2000. The ultimate turning point in America that has brought us to this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moondust
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 01:34 AM Response to Original message |
53. Echoes of Watergate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kablooie
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 01:34 AM Response to Original message |
54. Well, that was convenient, wasn't it? God. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 02:11 AM Response to Original message |
55. Whoah. This is very disturbing. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 02:52 AM Response to Original message |
57. "Nuremberg Laws' Judges being brought in" -- !!! Heil, Koch Bros + Chamber of Commerce -- !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr_Jefferson_24
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 05:52 AM Response to Reply #57 |
61. I'll second that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 01:29 PM Response to Reply #61 |
88. Never saw that quote before -- FDR Memorial -- Thanks -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quakerboy
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 03:01 AM Response to Original message |
59. Shouldnt that be "randomly" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 03:07 AM Response to Original message |
60. Every move they make here is just solidifying the view that the 1% has rigged the system. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nineteen50
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 06:07 AM Response to Original message |
62. another act of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 06:59 AM Response to Original message |
63. The U.S.A. don't do justice, it's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 07:01 AM Response to Original message |
64. Gauleiter Bloomberg and the 1% want to set up Nazi style courts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
65. Is it fascism yet? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 10:49 AM Response to Reply #65 |
80. Most definitly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 09:01 AM Response to Original message |
66. And the boot is being lowered.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 09:03 AM Response to Original message |
67. Kafka-esque America. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellerpup
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 09:04 AM Response to Original message |
68. If she can be removed, then it's time for Thomas to go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 09:14 AM Response to Original message |
69. "court administrators" ??? who the fuck are they? what branch of government? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillwaiting
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
70. Absolutely 100% Grade A Fascism in all its glory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snot
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
72. We need more info. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
73. I just hope that things won't get really bad, fast. Welcome to police state, folks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AsahinaKimi
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
74. The war on the 99% continues... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MgtPA
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 10:22 AM Response to Reply #74 |
76. Numbers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseymoz
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
77. The headline's misleading. There's no news here. Calm down everybody. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
socialindependocrat
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
86. THE MAYOR HAS GOT TO GO!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
socialindependocrat
![]() |
Wed Nov-16-11 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
87. Just another Scott Walker!!! - VOTE HIM OUT!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC