|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 01:40 PM Original message |
Sexual economics: sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
1. ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hifiguy
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 02:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. I am with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 01:32 AM Response to Reply #12 |
21. I'm surprised it's been kind-of disappointing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 01:00 PM Response to Reply #21 |
31. I think I suggested a similar proposition in one of the threads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 02:15 PM Response to Reply #31 |
43. None of the females here seek to "regulate" or "ban" porn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Sat Nov-19-11 12:47 AM Response to Reply #43 |
80. oh no! Sorry, I'm not available, if that's where you were going with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
2. Poor form to post something like this without comment of your own. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sherman A1
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 01:46 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I will K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 01:48 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 01:51 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. When did DU become a Japanese forum? Hey, look, dewd, you can do whatever you want. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 01:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. What would be the purpose of that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 02:04 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Setting aside your earlier remarks that implied you prefer not to, just because, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 02:12 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. +! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 02:24 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. I think that there's enough in the article to get the discussion going. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 03:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. 12 posts (counting this one) and none discussing the subject of the article you posted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chorophyll
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 03:07 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. The provocative title plus having to download a PDF from who-knows-where |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boojatta
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 03:29 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Here's something that will offend a lot of people ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fawke Em
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 01:02 PM Response to Reply #18 |
32. The illogical aspect of this comment aside... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RC
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 03:23 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. How about posting something to get people to click on the link in the first place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
10. What is Obama's approval rating among social exchange heterosexual females? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Azathoth
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
11. I believe this falls under the technical category of "Duh" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 12:46 PM Response to Reply #11 |
24. I'm giving it the Sir Arthur Conan Doyle Award for the day... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MedicalAdmin
![]() |
Sat Nov-19-11 05:38 AM Response to Reply #24 |
84. There's another old saying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
d_r
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
13. I don't see that an economic exchange view |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpiralHawk
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 03:42 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. of coarse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
county worker
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
16. I don't mean this as a bragging thing but I have lots of questions about this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 09:22 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Just because they made the first move doesn't mean that they still didn't expect anything from it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
county worker
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 12:32 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. They expected sex. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 12:34 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Are you sure that's all? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arbusto_baboso
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 12:53 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Gotta agree with county worker on this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 12:54 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. I don't think that the paper assumes that they don't. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arbusto_baboso
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 12:58 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. But it DOES assume women are "after something" when they pursue sex. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 03:55 PM Response to Reply #27 |
72. The article is not about absolutes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 12:58 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. wrong place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
county worker
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 02:16 PM Response to Reply #23 |
44. Yes, I was there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Sat Nov-19-11 02:50 AM Response to Reply #44 |
83. Or maybe they loath sex and think everyone is a sinner and going to hell. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapislzi
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 01:28 PM Response to Reply #16 |
36. And you would be right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
29. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 01:25 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 01:32 PM Response to Reply #29 |
37. Deleted message |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 02:10 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. why not, indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hifiguy
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 02:22 PM Response to Reply #37 |
47. What you said, EOTE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 01:44 PM Response to Reply #29 |
38. There Comes a Time In Every Woman's Life |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 01:48 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. there comes a time in every man's life |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Sat Nov-19-11 12:54 AM Response to Reply #39 |
81. I get my oil changed at the dry cleaners |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 02:07 PM Response to Reply #29 |
40. I'm not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 02:21 PM Response to Reply #40 |
46. post 20. the stigmatization has nothing to do with the definition. post 20 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 02:25 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. That's not the definition of a whore in the article. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 02:27 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. so you have found a way to call all women whores while denying that is just what you are doing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 02:28 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. So you're saying if a woman has sex, and expects anything other than enjoyment of the sex itself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 02:35 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. that is exactly the intent of this article. and put up purposely to play the game on du. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 02:38 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. For the second time, the article does not define prostitution that way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 02:44 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. again... the article found a way to call all women whores and pretend not. and again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 02:48 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. I'd like to get a grip on an assumption you're making. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 02:50 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. Have you seriously somehow missed the conventional wisdom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 02:54 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. yes. they pretend. they imply. they wiggle around. they giggle. and then, they pretend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 02:56 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. I don't think that all women are prostitutes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 03:07 PM Response to Reply #58 |
63. Did I ask you if that's what you thought? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 03:12 PM Response to Reply #63 |
65. What would be the definition of "prostitute" in that statement of conventional wisdom? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 03:13 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. *sigh* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 03:23 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. "I'm just going to assume you're being disingenuous. It's the kinder assumption. Good day." n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Nikon
![]() |
Sat Nov-19-11 01:35 AM Response to Reply #46 |
82. I don't know why the concept seems so foreign to you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trackfan
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
30. In other news: Dog Bites Man. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
33. Hmm. I think there's a key point they're missing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 02:58 PM Response to Reply #33 |
59. courtship with patriarchal systems of controls tells about the system of control |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Tires
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
35. So? Is it something you agree or disagree with? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 02:12 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. I think it would have been lost in the 900-post thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guitar man
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
45. Well Duh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
56. the article finds its premise isn't universal by looking beyond hetero relationships |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 02:58 PM Response to Reply #56 |
60. Thank you for your on-topic response, free of ad hominems. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 02:59 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. like it is not obvious to a half way thinking person. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 03:06 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. LOL. NT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 03:11 PM Response to Reply #61 |
64. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LadyHawkAZ
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 03:26 PM Response to Reply #56 |
69. Great post, wish I could rec it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 03:34 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. Did you understand it? She basically said that the article, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LadyHawkAZ
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 04:01 PM Response to Reply #70 |
73. If I didn't find idiocy interesting, I'd have more people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LadyHawkAZ
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 09:38 PM Response to Reply #70 |
74. Incidentally, failing to account for historical factors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 10:14 PM Response to Reply #74 |
75. the failure bet is cause they did not take any of it into account. and not taking into it into |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LadyHawkAZ
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 11:37 PM Response to Reply #75 |
76. Kathleen Vohs is a she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LadyHawkAZ
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
67. Congrats, LoZo. You posted something interesting! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
71. Everybody's gotta believe something... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Nikon
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 11:45 PM Response to Original message |
77. Sex is a dirty, filthy, disgustingly repulsive act |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 11:54 PM Response to Reply #77 |
78. You should check out the article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Nikon
![]() |
Sat Nov-19-11 12:45 AM Response to Reply #78 |
79. I did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC