|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
sasha031
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 07:48 PM Original message |
OH Please!!! Secret Service Now Authorized To Protect Herman Cain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exultant Democracy
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
1. Just because he is a fool doesn't mean he isn't a high profile candidate for president. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 07:56 PM Response to Reply #1 |
14. He a 1%er..let him paid for his own protection. How is he special? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exultant Democracy
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 08:29 PM Response to Reply #14 |
31. He is special only because he is running for president after RFK we decided to protect them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Tires
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 09:25 AM Response to Reply #14 |
42. +1000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sasha031
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 07:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
17. .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
2. I just got that email alert -- What the fuck for? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyberpj
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
3. Agreed. It's bad enough, the money they extort for campaigns from 'supporters' -now this? Waste of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Earth_First
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
4. I was always under the impression that it was for the GOP Presidential nominee... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
5. This is a racist country. He's AA. I'm sure he has had death threats from some Teabagger/Minuteman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lbrtbell
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 08:06 PM Response to Reply #5 |
23. That still doesn't qualify him for Secret Service |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 08:19 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Shouldn't be the tax payer's problem, but it is. Obama was also protected as a candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 12:48 AM Response to Reply #23 |
38. Yes it does. Did you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sgent
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 06:33 AM Response to Reply #23 |
41. So was RFK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 08:19 PM Response to Reply #5 |
27. I actually agree with you here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metta
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
6. He needs to be protected from himself, God knows. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 07:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Bwah! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 07:54 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Did you hear his latest? "What language do they speak in Cuba? Cuban?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Glimmer of Hope
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 08:02 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. No way. Someone dumber than Palin! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 08:24 PM Response to Reply #20 |
29. It's true...Tweety had it on his show tonight. The man is an IDIOT! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TroglodyteScholar
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
7. There goes the hypocrite... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
9. "Oh, Please" be damned! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DisgustipatedinCA
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
10. I assume they have their reasons. Let's keep him safe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scorpiogirl
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
12. What a gross misuse of tax dollars n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
13. "achieved prominence". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
15. High profile candidates warrant SS protection. This doesn't offend me at all. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Earth_First
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 08:02 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. The 'high profile' GOP candidate waxes and wanes quicker than the moon... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 05:13 AM Response to Reply #21 |
39. So what? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exultant Democracy
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 08:30 PM Response to Reply #15 |
32. It seems like a no brainier to me. Same reason Obama got protection as a candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 04:20 PM Response to Reply #32 |
45. Off topic, but I love that username. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mucifer
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
16. I'm fine with it. I don't want him killed. Obama had Secret service long before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
18. from those he's sexually harassed ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
19. Wasteful government spending? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lob1
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
22. They can't save him when he's buried in an avalanche |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillowTree
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
24. Like him or not, he's a candidate for the presidency and if he's received threats, it's appropriate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 08:16 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. +1. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
28. I don't like him but I don't want him to be assassinated (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politicalboi
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
30. Couldn't his pizza delivery guys do it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestate10
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
33. The CAD asked for protection. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
34. This is absolutely justifiable and there is ample precedent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
35. Well if your only going to get the 15 minute treatment why not go all out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pa28
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
36. I'll bet this has more to do with his ego than personal safety. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whoa_Nelly
![]() |
Thu Nov-17-11 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
37. Probably Koch connected to some degree, and the sex scandal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bunny
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 06:12 AM Response to Original message |
40. Candidate Obama started receiving Secret Service protection in May 2007, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 04:20 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. I wonder if increasingly early protection is going to be a trend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
43. Keep him safe, Secret Service! We Democrats need the entertainment!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane
![]() |
Fri Nov-18-11 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
46. I have absolutely no problem with this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC