Glenn Greenwald: Here's how White House aligned groups are going to try and co-opt OWS movement

Better Believe It

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Nov-19-11 09:58 PM
Original message

Glenn Greenwald: Here's how White House aligned groups are going to try and co-opt OWS movement

Here�s what attempted co-option of OWS looks like
By Glenn Greenwald
November 19, 2011

As I noted several weeks ago, WH-aligned groups such as the Center for American Progress have made explicitly clear that they are going to try to convert OWS into a vote-producing arm for the Obama 2012 campaign, and that�s what �Occupy Congress� is designed to achieve. I believed then and � having spent the last few weeks talking with many OWS protesters around the country � believe even more so now that these efforts will inevitably fail: those who have animated the Occupy movement are not motivated by partisan allegiance or an overarching desire to devote themselves to one of the two parties. In fact, one of the original Occupy groups � as opposed to partisan organizations swooping in to exploit it � has announced its own D.C. occupation to, in part, �demonstrate the failure of the Democrats and Republicans in Congress to represent the views of the majority of people.�

But whatever else is true, the notion � advanced by SEIU (Service Employees International Union) � that it�s the Democratic Party and the Obama White House working to bring about these changes and implant these values of the 99% is so self-evidently false as to be insulting. Agitating for passage of the jobs bill is a perfectly reasonable and sensible step, but how can casting that in such starkly partisan terms be justified when numerous key Democratic officials opposed the bill and prevented its passage (just as an always-changing roster of numerous key Democrats � the Villains of the Moment � almost always act to protect the interests of Washington�s permanent ruling factions)?

Beyond that, and more important, does SEIU think that people will just ignore these key political facts? How does anyone think these protesters will be convinced that it�s exclusively the GOP � and not the Democratic Party and the Obama WH � who �protect the rich� when: Wall Street funded the Democrats far more than the GOP in the 2008 election; the Democrats� key money man, Charles Schumer, is one of the most devoted Wall Street servants in the country; Obama empowered in key positions Wall Street servants such as Tim Geithner, Larry Summers, Bill Daley, Rahm Emanuel, and an endless roster of former Goldman officials; JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon has been dubbed �Obama�s favorite banker� after Obama publicly defended his post-bailout $17 million bonus; the President named the CEO of GE to head his jobs panel; the DCCC and DSCC exist to ensure the nomination of corporatist candidates and Blue Dogs whose political worldview is servitude to the lobbyist class; the Democratic President, after vocally urging an Age of Austerity, tried very hard to usher in cuts to Social Security and an increase in the age for Medicare eligibility; and the Obama administration has not only ensured virtually no accountability for the rampant Wall Street fraud that precipitated the 2008 financial crisis, but is actively pressuring New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and others to agree to a woefully inadequate settlement to forever shield banks from the consequences of their pervasive mortgage fraud.

That�s just a fraction of the facts one could list to document the actual factions to which the Democratic Party has devoted itself. If one wants to argue that the GOP is more opposed to progressive economic policies than Democrats, that�s certainly reasonable. If one wants to argue that, on balance, voting for Democrats is more likely to bring about marginally more of those policies than abstaining, I think that, too, is reasonable. But to try to cast the Democratic Party and the Obama administration as the vessel for the values and objectives of the Occupy movement is just dishonest in the extreme: in fact, it�s so extreme that it�s very unlikely to work. Those who believe that further empowerment of the Democratic Party is what is most urgently needed can make their case and should pursue that goal � they should try to generate as much citizen enthusiasm as possible behind them � but they should stop trying to depict and exploit the Occupy movement as an instrument for their agenda.

Read the full article at:

http://www.salon.com/2011/11/19/heres_what_attempted_co_option_of_ows_looks_like/singleton/