|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
ThomWV
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 10:31 AM Original message |
Why hasn't President Obama sent in Federal Troops to protect the protestors? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
1. unrec |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 10:34 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. good, now answer the question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 10:44 AM Response to Reply #2 |
9. ignore stupid question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 10:51 AM Response to Reply #9 |
15. Then explain this quote from your vaunted President: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 12:07 PM Response to Reply #15 |
26. self-explanatory quote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 01:08 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. That self-explanatory quote applies everywhere in the world but here, huh? (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piratefish08
![]() |
Mon Nov-21-11 07:22 AM Response to Reply #26 |
36. sure is - human rights, universal, freedom to assemble, free speech, US will defend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piratefish08
![]() |
Mon Nov-21-11 07:19 AM Response to Reply #1 |
35. typical response on DU to much asked but still not answered question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
3. Kennedy sent in troops during the civil rights protests because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 10:40 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. That is precisely what I had in my mind's eye. So, where are they? Where is the President? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peregrine
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 10:46 AM Response to Reply #3 |
12. He was enforcing federal law and court rulings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
former9thward
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 11:44 AM Response to Reply #12 |
20. What federal law and what court rulings? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 11:51 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. When Kennedy federalized the Alabama National Guard, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
former9thward
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 01:03 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. There is a fine line there between enforcing orders and keeping ordert. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal
![]() |
Mon Nov-21-11 05:14 AM Response to Reply #28 |
34. First, he was enforcing a court order - that of the US Supreme Court. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marnie
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 01:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
31. He only sent troops into the South. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
4. Recommend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
haikugal
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
6. Because he's one of the 1%...he never had a pair of comfy shoes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
7. Unrec |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
8. The Egyptians thought the military was their friend for a while |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 10:48 AM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Are you saying that Obama does not control the military? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
10. What would be bipartisan about that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
11. It doesn't work that way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 11:08 AM Response to Reply #11 |
18. History also tells us that a clearly spoken leadership |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 11:11 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. I personally prefer seeing the local heros show themselves first, and the cowards revealed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Magoo48
![]() |
Mon Nov-21-11 07:32 AM Response to Reply #18 |
38. Agreed, leadership would be a damn good place to start... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xiamiam
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 11:51 AM Response to Reply #11 |
22. does someone need to die before we are at that level? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 02:22 PM Response to Reply #22 |
32. They need to see a blatant, sweeping, widespread, institutional level of disregard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
13. He's in Australia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 10:53 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Are their phones out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 10:55 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. one would think so -- the silence is deafening, ain't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoCubsGo
![]() |
Mon Nov-21-11 08:13 AM Response to Reply #13 |
42. No, he isn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
21. My attempt of a similar nature invoking FDR (Flint protests) was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eilen
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
24. Probably busy directing his legal dept. to ensure that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
25. He's No Kennedy that stood up to George Wallace. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
27. And bite the hand that feeds him, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marnie
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
30. Remember this is a man who had no problem telling the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xicano
![]() |
Sun Nov-20-11 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
33. Because Obama is serving the 1% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piratefish08
![]() |
Mon Nov-21-11 07:23 AM Response to Original message |
37. i'm sure we'll see some bravery in speechifying this week. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy
![]() |
Mon Nov-21-11 07:52 AM Response to Original message |
39. Because that would be unconstitutional absent a court order. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoCubsGo
![]() |
Mon Nov-21-11 08:23 AM Response to Reply #39 |
44. Not to mention... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
justiceischeap
![]() |
Mon Nov-21-11 07:56 AM Response to Original message |
40. 'Cause he was too busy telling DHS to break them up? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cid_B
![]() |
Mon Nov-21-11 08:10 AM Response to Original message |
41. Why would he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Earth_First
![]() |
Mon Nov-21-11 08:20 AM Response to Original message |
43. Am I the only one who this scares the shit out of? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC