|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 12:11 PM Original message |
Poll question: Should Democrats Agree To "Entitlement" Cuts If Republicans Agree To Tax Increases On The Rich? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
1. FUCK NO. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
2. Deleted message |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 12:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. I didn't have room to post "Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid" cuts in the caption. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 12:21 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. Why? We're entitled to them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rurallib
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 12:34 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. because 'entitlement' is a republican code word meant to bring up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 12:50 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. I generally agree, but I think "entitlement" is actually positive for our side... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
3. NO NO NO. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
montanacowboy
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
4. Hell NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Autumn
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
6. NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
7. Unless you are talking over and above the Bush/Obama cuts, why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 12:32 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. The Obama administration and Democrats proposed some tax increases as part of a deal to cut benefits |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 12:34 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 02:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. I understand they did but I don't see the point of the proposal if those cuts aren't over and above |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
8. That's moving in the wrong direction. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
11. The Republicans are not going to raise taxes on the Rich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pansypoo53219
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
14. IF THE BUSH TAX CUTS DIE, the debt will be fixed over a few years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 12:57 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. That would help but ending the Bush/Obama tax cuts for the rich is not nearly enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 01:13 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Fuck. It. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
17. No, Hell no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtown1123
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
20. HELL NO. These programs aren't bargaining chips n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 05:04 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. According to Senator Kerry they were. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
21. They shouldn't but they probably will even if there are no increased taxes on the rich. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
22. HELL NO! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
24. Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
25. Wait, is this part of the Kabuki scheduled before or after they make the defense cuts go away? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 10:33 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. I think after. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
27. Or to rephrase the question: are Americans entitled to entitlements? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC