|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
MichaelMcGuire
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 03:58 PM Original message |
9/11's most controversial photo? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
1. Looks like a group of middle class americans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brickbat
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
2. And they should be doing....what instead? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trumad
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
3. Not even close... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
southernyankeebelle
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 05:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
28. What he is thinking is Yes, yes now we can invade Iraq and whup them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica
![]() |
Wed Nov-23-11 06:59 AM Response to Reply #3 |
53. His pants are literally twisted into a knot in that photo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
4. Discuss what? Photoshop? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demit
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 04:06 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. You win the thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
markpkessinger
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 09:18 PM Response to Reply #4 |
50. I don't believe it was Photoshopped... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brickbat
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
5. "The people in this photograph cannot help being alive, and showing it." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trumad
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 04:06 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Just read it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brickbat
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 04:10 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. It blows hard, indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trumad
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 04:15 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. I sat with a bunch of friends on a hill in Pacific Heights-San Fran... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deaniac21
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 05:37 PM Response to Reply #5 |
35. Lost me at "brilliant blue water" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brickbat
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 07:06 PM Response to Reply #35 |
46. As I say, it blows hards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
6. How is it controversial? What would you have them do? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
9. Were you trying to make some point? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MichaelMcGuire
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 04:12 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 05:24 PM Response to Reply #13 |
26. I think it looks fake, but that's about it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHB
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 05:46 PM Response to Reply #13 |
37. I think the Guardian columnist was overwrought to the point of ridiculousness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
10. Not controversial, IMO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
12. I poop on this thread from great height. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
14. No n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sibelian
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
15. This has been discussed already |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpiralHawk
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
17. "Cool. I like even better than my pic. Smirk." - xCommander AWOL (R) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
18. Looks like a piss-poor photo-shop job to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
supernova
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
19. Nah. It's an odd photo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MichaelMcGuire
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
20. So you all conclude the pictures shite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 05:19 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. No, just confused as to WHY you thought it might be controversial. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MichaelMcGuire
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 06:52 PM Response to Reply #24 |
44. The newspaper thought so I wondered if Americans thought so too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Wed Nov-23-11 06:21 AM Response to Reply #44 |
51. Posting articles in full is definitely against the rules, but links are encouraged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MichaelMcGuire
![]() |
Wed Nov-23-11 06:54 AM Response to Reply #51 |
52. The 1st I had known of the rules was when I had to delete a tread... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
21. If they were biking in the park before it happened |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
22. I think this one is much more controversial: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica
![]() |
Wed Nov-23-11 07:04 AM Response to Reply #22 |
54. And to think we might never have seen that one if his Secret Service had done their job |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
23. I am not sure why anyone would find that controversial. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ter
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
25. Is that taken in Staten Island? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
27. Deleted message |
Rex
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 05:30 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. So IOW you see them just cracking jokes, so the rest of us must |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
begin_within
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 05:34 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Herewith the first demonstration of my point. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 06:03 PM Response to Reply #32 |
39. No thank you for the acknowledgement of what I said is true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 05:32 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. Perhaps the people pictured aren't lounging |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 06:05 PM Response to Reply #31 |
40. No no, he made his judgment call and has to stick by it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Courtesy Flush
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
29. Do you even remember that day? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LuckyLib
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 05:36 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. Yup. We've been so manipulated by media that we read unintended stuff into any |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
csziggy
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
34. Real photo but more depth the the story than implied by the image |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hifiguy
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
36. That looks as photoshopped as the pic with Evil Bert |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
38. where? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
41. discuss? what? you think about it and get back to us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
42. this photo has already been discussed and the people involved have replied |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dipsydoodle
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
43. Exact history of that photo here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 07:21 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. "Apparently sunbathing"? What crap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
csziggy
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 07:23 PM Response to Reply #43 |
48. More on it here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagAss
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 06:59 PM Response to Original message |
45. Why..Should they have been kneeling in prayer?...or shitting their pants? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Tue Nov-22-11 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
49. and 99% of the rest of us were glued to the tube.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeHoops
![]() |
Wed Nov-23-11 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
55. No. The one of the Pentagon - no wing marks, no luggage, no debris - just a missile hole. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC