Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bloomberg: Renewable power trumps fossil fuels for FIRST time!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 10:53 AM
Original message
Bloomberg: Renewable power trumps fossil fuels for FIRST time!!!
Edited on Sat Nov-26-11 10:56 AM by kpete
Renewable power trumps fossil fuels for first time



Renewable energy is surpassing fossil fuels for the first time in new power-plant investments, shaking off setbacks from the financial crisis and an impasse at the United Nations global warming talks.

Electricity from the wind, sun, waves and biomass drew $187 billion last year compared with $157 billion for natural gas, oil and coal, according to calculations by Bloomberg New Energy Finance using the latest data. Accelerating installations of solar- and wind-power plants led to lower equipment prices, making clean energy more competitive with coal.


"The progress of renewables has been nothing short of remarkable," United Nations Environment Program Executive Secretary Achim Steiner said in an interview. "You have record investment in the midst of an economic and financial crisis."

The findings indicate the world is shifting toward consuming more renewable energy even without a global agreement on limiting greenhouse gases. Delegates from more than 190 nations converge in Durban, South Africa, on Nov. 28 to discuss new measures for limiting emissions damaging the climate.

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-renewables-20111125,0,2421278.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Only electrical generation and only new plants
"The New Energy Finance figures exclude investment that merely replaces existing plants, and its renewables tally excludes money spent on building large hydropower projects."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. What exactly does that mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It means that alternate energy is still a very small percentage of total energy usage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darth marth Donating Member (170 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It means the corporations are getting sick of being jacked by other corporations
and with the ridiculous cost of power these days, it is much cheaper to set up your own system of alternative energy.

With this shift, the cost of alternative renewable energy will get cheaper for all of us as production increases and easier solutions are found.

Imagine what would happen if all of our brainpower was put into this instead of war....that is the direction we are heading and that is why the dinosaurs are so worried, this is their last chance to get rich off of energy that should have been free for decades now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Thanks for the information. At one time, we had a wind
powered generator at our ranch (that was easily 70-80 years ago) before rural electrification. The two windmills which service the 2 areas with houses have both been changed to submersible electric pumps and the newer well is electric. We still have 3 wind powered wells. The rural electric coop has been bought out twice now and is becoming less and less user friendly. I am really interested in seeing what and how we could switch (actually go back)and add wind power. With the horrible drought we are having, I don't have a penny extra but am wondering about the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Note that the OP was talking about global statistics.
The US is way behind. It is true that in some other countries it is cheaper to do alternative energy for new plants, partly because fossil fuels are taxed more and partly because they provide tax breaks and incentives for alternative energy.

I'd like to see the statistics for the US, because gas is a great deal cheaper in the US than on the global market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. Just posted this to Facebook. Spread it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. ^
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 17th 2024, 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC