|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-20-11 09:23 PM Original message |
Is there anybody in the GOP presidential candidate field who is qualified to be commander in chief? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HillbillyBob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-20-11 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
1. The very idea that any of the participants in this side show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-20-11 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
2. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-20-11 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
3. The Wannabees persist with moot drivel and band aids....no ideas cept for their Masters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-20-11 09:44 PM Response to Original message |
4. an elected president is automatically qualified by the constitution nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
solara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-20-11 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
5. Sure there are! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-20-11 10:34 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Republicans? No Brainer?....Dude!!!!.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
former9thward (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-20-11 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
6. It is sort of hard to throw rocks on this issue when the last two Democratic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-20-11 10:34 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. You don't have to have served in the military to understand it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
former9thward (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-20-11 11:11 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. That is utterly ridiculous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-20-11 11:13 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Asst. Secretary of the Navy is a civilian administrator position. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
former9thward (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-20-11 11:32 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Duh , I get that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-20-11 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
7. And pray tell, what precisely were Obama's qualifications to be CIC when he took office? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-20-11 10:37 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. The year is 2011, not 2008 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-21-11 12:54 AM Response to Reply #10 |
18. Yep, but it still applies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-20-11 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
11. The baggers think Sarah Palin is, you betcha! "We're puttin' a crosshairs target on ALL them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-20-11 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
12. Age + citizenship = sure! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-20-11 11:15 PM Response to Original message |
15. has there ever been? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-20-11 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
16. Well, Petraeus should be OK for the military side of things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fly by night (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-21-11 08:11 AM Response to Original message |
19. Basil Marceaux |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 10:04 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC