|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Are_grits_groceries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-27-11 03:47 PM Original message |
Idea of civilians using drone aircraft may soon fly with FAA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-27-11 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
1. I thought we already had them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-27-11 03:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Yup, and some of them are way to big to keep in your toybox. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-27-11 04:07 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Once they are commercialized, they've "escaped" and there won't be any going back. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pholus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-27-11 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
2. Don't worry. Like chemistry sets, owning drone aircraft will be seen as suspicious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saras (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-27-11 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
4. As long as I can use them against fucking leaf blowers, I'm fine with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-27-11 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
6. I want a Constitutional Amendment guaranteeing my right to privacy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Speck Tater (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-27-11 04:19 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. How about civilian owned anti-aircraft batteries? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-27-11 06:38 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. snort |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-27-11 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
9. A silly reaction to a silly article. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-27-11 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
10. Problem is that individuals/land owners do not own the airspace |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC