|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
FarCenter
![]() |
Tue Nov-29-11 09:35 PM Original message |
French man ordered to pay wife 10,000 euros for lack of sex |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trumad
![]() |
Tue Nov-29-11 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
1. Hope my wife never sues. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capt. America
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 07:47 AM Response to Reply #1 |
19. Tru: you're not supposed to be outside the sports forum. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trumad
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 07:57 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Yeah I know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Tue Nov-29-11 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
2. What--was the wife stupid or something? She should have filed for divorce |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bunny
![]() |
Tue Nov-29-11 09:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 06:27 AM Response to Reply #2 |
14. Perhaps she didn't want to divorce until the children grew up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 07:34 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Well, you cut your cloth according to your measure. If she was unhappy, she should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 07:39 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 08:32 AM Response to Reply #17 |
23. I noted that they weren't named in the report, so I don't think public humiliation was the goal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bunny
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 09:41 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Regardless of why the wife may have stayed in the marriage, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 11:44 AM Response to Reply #25 |
30. +1. It honestly sounds like sharia law--and not in a good way. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 11:48 AM Response to Reply #25 |
32. "The person who isn't getting their sex needs met has options" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 11:42 AM Response to Reply #23 |
28. Sometimes, the names don't cross the pond because either we have differing standards, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 01:14 PM Response to Reply #2 |
36. Well, you've obviously never been in her shoes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 10:14 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. If you "blame yourself" for over a decade, then you do only have yourself to blame. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer
![]() |
Tue Nov-29-11 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
3. That means I'm at least due beer and travel money. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Tue Nov-29-11 09:41 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. that is funny... lol. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Tue Nov-29-11 09:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 06:33 AM Response to Reply #3 |
15. Best DUzy for the week |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 01:06 PM Response to Reply #3 |
35. ROFL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Petrushka
![]() |
Tue Nov-29-11 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
6. --- nevermind --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Tue Nov-29-11 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
8. I hope this puts the D. Strauss-Kahn matter in a better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Tue Nov-29-11 10:21 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. no. i dont see rape having anything to do with this. french or otherwise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin
![]() |
Tue Nov-29-11 10:57 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Strauss-Kahn has also had a great many affairs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Tue Nov-29-11 11:00 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. as is his current prostitution ring issue arising not the same. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin
![]() |
Tue Nov-29-11 11:08 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. OK, that one I didn't know about. He does get around... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 07:55 AM Response to Reply #12 |
21. The guy's middle name should be Sleazy....here's a brief run-down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 09:16 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. The only one I feel strongly about is the Tristane Banon accusation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 11:29 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Well, like Herman Cain, where there's smoke, there's probably fire. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 10:42 PM Response to Reply #26 |
39. That's an attitude I strongly deprecate, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Thu Dec-01-11 01:55 AM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Yeah, but mud will dry up and you can brush it off. Fire will burn your house down. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 11:55 AM Response to Reply #8 |
33. thinking further, you bringing up dsk. as a poster stated below. no one is owed sex. in marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recovered Repug
![]() |
Tue Nov-29-11 11:24 PM Response to Original message |
13. Some men pay for sex. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 06:42 AM Response to Original message |
16. If he can just put it off a few months... the fine might be 0 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 07:52 AM Response to Original message |
20. Maybe he should have sued her for not getting the hint |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Remmah2
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
27. Herman Cain may be next on the list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
29. Deleted message |
bemildred
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 11:45 AM Response to Reply #29 |
31. +1. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 12:26 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Well-said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backtoblue
![]() |
Wed Nov-30-11 01:17 PM Response to Reply #29 |
37. agree! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC