Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Passes Bill Allowing Indefinite Detention of Americans.Considers Bill Authorizing More Tortur

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 10:13 AM
Original message
Senate Passes Bill Allowing Indefinite Detention of Americans.Considers Bill Authorizing More Tortur
Edited on Wed Nov-30-11 10:14 AM by Roland99
http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/senate-passes-bill-allowing-indefinite-detention-americans-considers-bill-authorizing-mo

The Senate passed a bill today allowing indefinite detention of American citizens living within the U.S.

While some have claimed that this is incorrect, and that American citizens would be exempted from the indefinite detention within U.S. borders authorized by the Act, the Committee chairman who co-sponsored the bill – Carl Levin – stated today in Senate debate that it could apply to American citizens.

Levin cited the Supreme Court case of Hamdi which ruled that American citizens can be treated as enemy combatants:

“The Supreme Court has recently ruled there is no bar to the United States holding one of its own citizens as an enemy combatant,” said Levin. “This is the Supreme Court speaking.“


Under questioning from Rand Paul, co-sponsor John McCain said that Americans suspected of terrorism could be sent to Guantanamo.




Ain't democracy grand???

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ah, Carl Levin -- another "Democrat" looking out for our interests!
Having "two" parties is great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. When running low on toilet paper, apparently the Constitution will suffice.
Edited on Wed Nov-30-11 10:19 AM by Pacifist Patriot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hotler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. It's just god damn piece of paper. Toe the line or be.....
sent to a reeducation camp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hifiguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. The Constitution has been de facto repealed
Edited on Wed Nov-30-11 10:36 AM by hifiguy
except for the Second Amendment. It is no longer a document of any more significance than the constitution of the old USSR. As with the Soviet Union's constitution, the rights exist as long as a citizen never tries to invoke them. Try to invoke them and you will be beaten, jailed or worse.

Edit for clarification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. Holy Shit.
Lead a protest, get branded as an enemy of the state, get taken away indefinitely without trial.

This is what we've come to? So much for democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. Holy Shit.
Lead a protest, get branded as an enemy of the state, get taken away indefinitely without trial.

This is what we've come to? So much for democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kudzu22 Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. Wait, this passed the Senate?!?
And it was sponsored by Carl Levin? Who's in charge? Is Harry Reid asleep? God help me but I hope the GOP House defeats it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The Udall amendment, which would have deleted this provision, lost
Edited on Wed Nov-30-11 10:49 AM by Mass
38 to 60. All Dems (including Reid) except Rand Paul.

Sadly, way too many people voted against it, including surprising names like Whitehouse. http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=112&session=1&vote=00210
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC