Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Matt Taibbi: Federal Judge Pimp-Slaps the SEC Over Citigroup Settlement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
tpsbmam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 11:39 AM
Original message
Matt Taibbi: Federal Judge Pimp-Slaps the SEC Over Citigroup Settlement
Federal Judge Pimp-Slaps the SEC Over Citigroup Settlement


Just a quick update on a big piece of news that came through yesterday. In one of the more severe judicial ass-whippings you’ll ever see, federal Judge Jed Rakoff rejected a slap-on-the-wrist fraud settlement the SEC had cooked up for Citigroup.

Rakoff’s 15-page final ruling read like a political document, serving not just as a rejection of this one deal but as a broad and unequivocal indictment of the regulatory system as a whole. He particularly targeted the SEC’s longstanding practice of greenlighting relatively minor fines and financial settlements alongside de facto waivers of civil liability for the guilty – banks commit fraud and pay small fines, but in the end the SEC allows them to walk away without admitting to criminal wrongdoing.

<snip>

This practice is a legal absurdity for several reasons. By accepting hundred-million-dollar fines without a full public venting of the facts, the SEC is leveling seemingly significant punishments without telling the public what the defendant is being punished for. This has essentially created a parallel or secret criminal justice system, in which both crime and punishment are adjudicated behind closed doors.

<snip>

Quoting Judge Rakoff here:

Finally, in any case like this that touches on the transparency of financial markets whose gyrations have so depressed our economy and debilitated our lives, there is an overriding public interest in knowing the truth. In much of the world, propaganda reigns, and truth is confined to secretive, fearful whispers. Even in our nation, apologists for suppressing or obscuring the truth may always be found. But the S.E.C., of all agencies, has a duty, inherent in its statutory mission, to see that the truth emerges; and if it fails to do so, this Court must not, in the name of deference or convenience, grant judicial enforcement to the agency's contrivances.


It's Taibbi -- of course it's worth going to the link and reading the whole thing.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. "secret justice is not justice"
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DocMac Donating Member (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think i'll add Judge Rakoff to my Christmas card list. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hifiguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. It is evident that Judge Rakoff is _seriously_ pissed off.
Judges do not write opinions like that one without a very compelling reason. And Judge Rakoff is right in every particular. Good for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. "Jed Rackoff"? Seriously?
Who said parents lack a sense of humor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirkGently Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Absolutely. Regulatory capture is a huge part of the problem. The SEC is as bad as it gets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC