|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
catabryna
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 12:31 PM Original message |
Mall security cameras... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
1. Interesting point. Although if you are in a public place, albeit privately owned, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
2. Cameras are there for more than the reasons you mention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catabryna
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 12:45 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Which then begs the question... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 01:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. The mall may or may not choose to discipline its employees, but its clear they own the video |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catabryna
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 01:29 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. The point of my post was not related to the legality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 01:34 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. I actually find it sad that this sort of thing even has to be discussed; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 01:45 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. I gave up on expecting civil let alone ethical behavior out of most people years ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 01:56 PM Response to Reply #3 |
19. If we actually believed in the right to the pursuit of happiness, we would protect dignity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipi_k
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 10:48 AM Response to Reply #19 |
33. I think that video went a bit further than entertainment.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jokerman
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
4. They most likely didn't have a "right" to post the video. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catabryna
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 01:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. Not everyone can be personally identifiable by video... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
5. It seems to me to be highly unethical. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 01:12 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. That's the problem I have with "reality TV" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 01:24 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. If its in public, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shagbark Hickory
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
6. The video that was released did not reveal the person's identity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 01:08 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. IOW, you're saying a corporation can post security videos to YouTube? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 01:20 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Its quite legal for them to do so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shagbark Hickory
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 01:22 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Yeah, why not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 06:25 AM Response to Reply #11 |
28. What about "corporation" and "security videos" did I not make clear? The contract should preclude |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shagbark Hickory
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 02:02 PM Response to Reply #28 |
38. As for the contract the security workers have and the mall company.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
9. You have no right to privacy while out in public and they own the video |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CBGLuthier
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
18. Public Space.Public Event. Tough Shit.Learn to look where you are going. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansasVoter
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 02:01 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. You sound like a real jerk! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipi_k
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 11:09 AM Response to Reply #21 |
36. Hah...let's tweak it a bit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catabryna
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 02:20 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. Wow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 08:41 AM Response to Reply #18 |
31. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansasVoter
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
20. They had a right to release t but I would never visit the mall again. Very rude and tacky to release |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 02:09 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Exactly. May be legal, but certainly not an ethical thing to do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sirveri
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
24. The guard got fired. But they still have the right to release it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catabryna
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 02:53 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Thanks for letting me know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sirveri
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 06:10 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. I understood your point... but I'm not sure it's relevant in a corporate setting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IcyPeas
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
26. No one would've known who she was... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 06:29 AM Response to Original message |
29. How can anyone support this breach of ethics? THE PURPOSE IS SECURITY, NOT COMEDY FODDER. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 08:38 AM Response to Original message |
30. Its an issue between employer and employee and company policy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
32. decency and right does not factor into society today. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
34. Actually, I think the release of this video was a public service. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buenaventura
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
35. security cameras do absolutely nothing to "prevent crime". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brilliantrocket
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
37. Somebody will always find a way to post this stuff on youtube. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Locrian
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
39. double fucking standard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC