|
Edited on Sat Jan-22-11 07:03 AM by WinkyDink
"In my lifetime, beginning to approach sixty years, I have seen an incredible shift in the intellectual prowess of those responsible for bringing us news and analysis, of those holding many significant elective offices, and those who perform research in science which is no longer seeking the Truth, but the proof that a commercial product is better than other commercial products, subsidized by the very folk who stand to gain largesse.
I will tell you quite frankly, listening to a wonderful interview of Walter Cronkite on Youtube the other week, that I sadly realized that although Cronkite was the anchor and the star of CBS all those years ago, the fact of the matter was that Sevareid, Murrow, Collingwood, and others were considered vastly more intellectual and aware than the famed anchor, and he deferred to them often for analysis and opinion. Of course, that was his job, and I mean no disrespect for the man, but it is simply a comparison of what we had then versus what we have now, which is indescribably bad." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
At 61, I agree 100% with your observations. Pick up a TIME or NEWSWEEK from 1973, say, and marvel at the AMOUNT of news, the IN-DEPTH reporting, the ADULT tone. Now? They try to cater to the youth consumer, and wonder why they, the mags, keep losing subscribers.
Television news died, IMO, with the firing of Dan Rather.
Moreover, one saw intellectuals actually ON TV talk-shows! Buckminster Fuller, Gore Vidal, Wm F. Buckley (okay, not my side, but still!), etc. Bill Moyers was the last of the breed.
I cannot beleive how far America has fallen. And the demise of respect for the intellectual is, IMO, connected to the demise of our liberties and economic health, for who is there to speak to the masses?
Seymour Hersh tries, but where is his mass-media "pulpit"?
|