Good article on the shooter;
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_COLORADO_SHOOTING_SUSPECT?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-07-20-22-58-04As far politics:
The Republicrat Demlican division is obviously very necessary to politicians, as are wedge issues. If it weren't for wedge issues and demonizing the other side, how ever would they distinguish themselves from the other side? Certainly not on "little" issues like war and the economy.
I don't mean rhetoric. Anyone can easily distinguish between the two Parties when it comes to their rhetoric. For example, Obama was anti- mandate and pro a strong public option, while Romney was pro mandate until he turned anti health care. Nor do I mean bills they file to keep the folks at home happy, knowing the bill will never pass. For example, HR 676, or single payor, which ended up being co-sponsored by just about every member of the Progressive Caucus--not ONE of whom even sent it for the mandatory budget
+I mean actual actions, as in, both Obama and Romney passed a health care bill with a mandate and little to no public option.
And now, Obama is stuck admitting publicly that he took his bill from Romney's (and Romney had taken his from Hillary, who had taken hers from the Republican Heritage Foundation).
Meanwhile, Romney is stuck trying to argue that when a state does the same thing as the feds do, it is entirely different. (Sure it is, Willard. The difference is that, at the time, you were Governor, not President, which is what you wanted to be. So, you did what you had the power to do. Had you been President, you would have done the same thing nationally.)
We now just about have two Republican Parties pretending they are more different from each other than they were in the days of Hoover and FDR. So, sure, they have to play up the demonization and the wedge issues.