OBama promises "entitlement" "reform."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/15/AR2009011504114.htmlNote that the date was shortly before his inauguration.
(As I have posted before in other contexts, watch out for the word "reform" these days. It used to mean a good thing. It rarely does in D.C. anymore.)
And then, there was appointment of the Cat Food Commission..
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8706605http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=5074961&mesg_id=5074989And when the recommendations of the Cat Food Commission got nowhere, we got the possibly unconstitutional joint Congressional Commission whose findings were supposed to be be binding on both Congress and, IIRC, the president.
Anything, just to cut what he referred to as "entitlements" somehow, without taking the political heat himself.
We have yet to see what will come of that possibly uncontitutional attempt to reach a "Grand" Bargain."
And Obama submitted a budget to Congress cutting fuel subsidies to the poor.
http://money.cnn.com/2011/02/11/news/economy/obama_heating_cuts/index.htm(Cesar Chavez gives Robert Kennedy, Jr. Venezuelan oil to GIVE AWAY FREE to people in New England in winter, but the United States can't use tax money paid in by Americans to save needy Americans from freezing to death in their homes in places like New England and Minnesota. (No U.S. oil company would donate, either.)
It is impossible--and dangerous to the 99%-- to keep pretending that Republicans are the only ones who hae been after social safety nets. And, when a Republicans go after them, that is only Republicans being Republicans. When Democrats go after them, it is a sea change that has changed America forever.
If we are very, very lucky, Romney Ryan will force Democrats to start defending these programs again, but you can't unring a bell.