Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How Todd Akin And Paul Ryan Partnered To Redefine Rape

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-12 10:30 PM
Original message
How Todd Akin And Paul Ryan Partnered To Redefine Rape
Todd Akin's remarks about how a woman won't get pregnant with "legitimate rape" have really gotten attention.

This is from The Talking Points Memo today:

How Todd Akin And Paul Ryan Partnered To Redefine Rape

Earlier today, Missouri U.S. Senate candidate Rep. Todd Akin (R-MO) claimed that “legitimate rape” does not often lead to pregnancy because “the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.” This is not the first time the biologically challenged senate candidate tried to minimize the impact of rape. Last year, Akin joined with GOP vice presidential candidate Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) as two of the original co-sponsors of the “No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act,” a bill which, among other things, introduced the country to the bizarre term “forcible rape.”

Federal law prevents federal Medicaid funds and similar programs from paying for abortions. Yet the law also contains an exception for women who are raped. The bill Akin and Ryan cosponsored would have narrowed this exception, providing that only pregnancies arising from “forcible rape” may be terminated. Because the primary target of Akin and Ryan’s effort are Medicaid recipients — patients who are unlikely to be able to afford an abortion absent Medicaid funding — the likely impact of this bill would have been forcing many rape survivors to carry their rapist’s baby to term. Michelle Goldberg explains who Akin and Ryan would likely target:

Under H.R. 3, only victims of “forcible rape” would qualify for federally funded abortions. Victims of statutory rape—say, a 13-year-old girl impregnated by a 30-year-old man—would be on their own. So would victims of incest if they’re over 18. And while “forcible rape” isn’t defined in the criminal code, the addition of the adjective seems certain to exclude acts of rape that don’t involve overt violence—say, cases where a woman is drugged or has a limited mental capacity. “It’s basically putting more restrictions on what was defined historically as rape,” says Keenan.

Although a version of this bill passed the GOP-controlled House, the “forcible rape” language was eventually removed due to widespread public outcry.


For an interesting read try the twitter trending page on Legitimate Rape

It's funny, sad, and outrageous. It makes me wonder how our country got this far along the road to extremism.

Oh, wait, now I remember. The DLC/Third Way policies of being complicit in order to build bipartisanship.....that did it. It shut down opposition for decades. That's all it took for this rabid extremism to take hold.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-12 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Best Twitter Lines
Edited on Sun Aug-19-12 11:40 PM by rpannier
"I misspoke" = "I accidentally said what I really believe"

Has Todd Akin started extolling the virtues of honor killings yet?

Todd Akin is making it so hard to be white in America

When was the last time something trended because it was something intelligent a Republican said?

First there was immaculate conception, now there's immaculate abortion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-12 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He's leading Claire McCaskill, too. Unbelievable.
It is just so hard to accept that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-12 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. He leads by six now which is not totally surprising
The New Guy Bounce
Let's see what the end of the week and month portend.
My guess is the Republicans will force him off the ballot or just choke off his funding and he'll disappear quickly
He'll have trouble getting independent funding
What business wants to be associated with this guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-12 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. Nothing more repulsive than five year olds who are always asking for it.
Edited on Mon Aug-20-12 02:12 AM by No Elephants
As if it hasn't always been hard enough to prove absence of consent with adults.

If McCaskill can't so something with that, she is hopeless.



Every time a Democrat does something for women or gays or any racial, ethnic or religious minority, he or she gets accused of pandering to some portion of the Democratic base.

A majority of WAS* males have voted Republican in every election. (Once upon a time, that was further limited to upper middle class and wealthy WASP males, but it has broadened.)

Hence, WAS males are the base of the Republican Party. So, why do we never label as pandering all the ridiculous protectiveness of Republicans over the people wo have always had the power in this country--and still do?

*WAS is WASP (white Anglo-Saxon Protestant) without the P. Now that the Republicans nominated Romney, a Mormon, I think it unfair to continue to accuse them of pandering to WASP males. Hence, I accuse them only of pandering to WAS males.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-12 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. I hate these fucks..........nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-12 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. hopefully, enough voters show up to destroy the GOP stronghold in the House. I can't believe these
knuckle-draggers get voted into office... wth! Concerns me how America's voters are really only one charismatic extremist leader away from removing 150 years of civil rights advances.



Get it here:
http://www.zazzle.com/rmoney_ryan_a_plan_called_austerity_sticker-217210752180754331?rf=238107662556833486
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-12 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Exactly.
And they are constantly on the lookout for the next "Reagan".
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec 25th 2024, 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC